Clin Diabetes
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leichter, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leichter, S. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Clinical Diabetes 23:187-190, 2005
© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2005


The Business of Diabetes

Making Outpatient Care of Diabetes More Efficient: Analyzing Noncompliance

Steven B. Leichter, MD, FACP, FACE

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.


    Introduction
 
Two recent brief articles1,2 in this "Business of Diabetes" department focused on common issues that may worsen clinical outcomes of outpatient diabetes care and make the care process more prolonged and complex. These issues were depression and borderline personality disorder, and both are examples of a multitude of problems that result in the failure of diabetic patients to adhere to the medical prescription for their condition. The effort to deal with the negative consequences of noncompliance prolongs the outpatient visit and makes service more complex.

Perhaps no aspect of outpatient diabetes care seems as frustrating to primary care providers as the problems that result in nonadherence. In our program, we have developed a menu of brief, simple assessments to identify the factors that contribute to this overall problem.


    "Nonadherence" Versus "Noncompliance"
 
Some years ago, diabetes educators argued that the term "adherence" be used preferentially instead of "compliance," and the term "nonadherence" be substituted for "noncompliance."3 The rationale for this proposal was that the term "noncompliance" implies a series of negative value judgments about patients as people. Instead, the term "nonadherence" was thought to imply a description of a failure to follow the medical prescription without any bias toward the patient as a person. Most authorities have endorsed this view.4 In addition, specific studies have noted that nonadherence may entail various components that may relate to flaws in the process of care and that do not entail a failure on the part of the patient.5,6

However, much of the medical community has never adopted this concept, and in many other areas of clinical practice, the term "noncompliance" remains the standard description of this adverse patient behavior.7,8 In diabetes care, the concept of "noncompliance" with associated innuendoes, remains prevalent.9,10 It is widespread knowledge that primary care providers in active clinical practice also still use . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Recognized Components of Noncompliance
 

    Effects of Noncompliance on Clinical Outcomes
 

    A Checklist for Noncompliance
 

    Improving Patient Adherence
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
S. B. Leichter
Evaluating The Therapeutic Package for Diabetic Patients: The Whole Exceeds the Sum of Its Parts
Clin. Diabetes, July 1, 2006; 24(3): 102 - 104.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Diabetes Diabetes Care Clinical Diabetes Diabetes Spectrum
Copyright © 2005 by the American Diabetes Association.