© American Diabetes Association ®, Inc., 2005
Heart Disease and Women: Is the Right Message Getting Through?Many patients and health care providers are unaware that cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in American women. Because diabetes is a well-established CVD risk equivalent, health care providers in practices that include a significant number of patients with diabetes should be particularly knowledgeable about this and should be able to discuss risks in real terms with their patients. Female patients, especially those with diabetes, should appreciate the magnitude of their own cardiovascular risk and understand what can be done to reduce that risk. Ask a group of women to name a condition they fear and a majority will say breast cancer. Breast cancer awareness has been increasing steadily in the United States in recent years and rightly deserves respect as a killer of women. And, after all, it is the "C" word. But how does it compare with CVD as a cause of mortality in American women? Let's look at some of the facts.
Yet misperceptions persist that CVD is not a real problem for women.
That diabetes significantly increases the risk for CVDboth heart disease and strokein women and men is well established. Diabetes is a particularly widespread problem in female populations. The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in 2002 in white women was 4.7%, compared to 12.6% in African-American and 11.3% in Mexican-American women.1 Further, it was estimated that the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in these populations was 2.7, 6.1, and 1.8%, respectively.1 And obesity, a risk factor for both CVD and diabetes, is epidemic; in 2002, 61.6% of all women in the United States were overweight or obese, including 57.2% of white, 71.7% of Mexican-American, and 77.2% of African-American women.1
Modification or prevention of the risk factors for CVD that often coexist with diabetes, such as obesity, hypertension, and high cholesterol, is an important goal for diabetic women. Other lifestyle risk factors that need to be discussed with patients and modified when present include physical inactivity and cigarette smoking. Today, when health care providers should be more aware than ever of the increased risk for CVD in women with diabetes, it is clear that differences in treatment between the sexes still exist. A study recently published in Diabetes Care3 reported on a cross-sectional analysis that included 3,849 patients with diabetes treated in five academic internal medicine practices between 2000 and 2003. Researchers reviewed medical records and compared the treatment for conditions such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CHD in women with the treatment of the same conditions in a group of men with similar risk. They found that women were less likely to be treated for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and diabetes or glucose intolerance and, if treated, were less likely to reach treatment goals. They were also less likely to be taking aspirin or cholesterol-lowering drugs. So, although clear evidence exists that women with diabetes are at increased risk for CHD and that this risk has been increasing during the past two decades, men and women still receive different treatment. Modifiable risk factors for CHD in women are simply treated less aggressively (read: not taken seriously enough, despite the preponderance of evidence to the contrary). It is time for health care providers to be more proactive in educating female patients about and treating them for their heart disease risk in order to start reversing this alarming CVD trend. REFERENCES 1 American Heart Association: Women and CVD: statistics [article online]. Updated 2005. Available from www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart 2 American Heart Association: Women and coronary heart disease [article online]. Updated 2005. Available from www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml?identifier=2859
3 Wexler DJ, Grant
RW, Meigs JB, Nathan DM, Cagliero E: Sex disparities in treatment of cardiac
risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes
Care 28: 514-520,2005
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||