Clinical Diabetes
26:100-113,
2008
DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.26.3.100
© 2008 by the American Diabetes Association
Weight Regain Prevention
Christina Garcia Ulen,
Mary Margaret Huizinga, MD, MPH,
Bettina Beech, DrPH and
Tom A. Elasy, MD, MPH
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
IN BRIEF
Long-term maintenance of weight loss is an important, but often elusive,
goal. Diet and pharmacological treatments for obesity are generally effective
at inducing 8-10% weight reductions by 6 months. Thereafter, weight regain is
a common phenomenon. Maintenance-phase medication and individual and group
follow-up slow weight regain such that weight reductions at program completion
average 2-6, 2-7, and 2-7% greater, respectively, than those in control groups
receiving no maintenance contact. Consistent and structured eating, frequent
self-weighing, and high levels of physical activity acquired through short
bouts of brisk walking are pragmatic recommendations to support weight regain
prevention.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. In
2005-2006, > 72 million adults, or 34% of the population > 20 years of
age, were obese (BMI 30
kg/m2).1
Obesity is significantly correlated with hypertension, hyperlipidemia,
diabetes, and infertility; yet, a 5% reduction in weight can translate into
clinically significant improvements in
health.2,3
Lifestyle and pharmacological interventions are effective at inducing
clinically significant levels of weight
loss.4-6
However, maintaining weight loss over a period of years has proved more
challenging and has lead to the classification of obesity as a chronic,
relapsing disease.7
Respective systematic reviews of pharmacological-, behavioral-, and diet-based
weight loss treatments conclude, however, that continued therapy is essential
for minimizing weight regain after weight
loss.8-12
This conceptual review of the weight regain phenomenon analyzes the
efficacy and clinical utility of formal weight loss and weight loss
maintenance programs and highlights factors underlying weight regain and
weight loss maintenance. Although weight regain prevention remains a
challenge, there is room for optimism; a nationally representative survey
estimates that 20% of individuals attempting weight loss are able to achieve
and maintain 5% weight reductions for at least 1
year.13 Among
successful weight losers, various studies indicate that more than 60, 35, and
19% of individuals are able to maintain 10% weight reductions for 1, 3, and 5
years,
respectively.14-16
 |
Methods
|
|---|
The first section presents the scope of the weight regain phenomenon by
analyzing the long-term efficacy of weight loss programs. Data have been
gathered from systematic and meta-analytical reviews of randomized controlled
trials of nonsurgical weight loss therapy programs. Weight loss surgery is an
option for some patients with obesity; a discussion of the risks and benefits
of surgery is beyond the scope of this article and will not be considered
here.
The second section presents the efficacy of weight loss maintenance
programs to support weight reduction and prevent weight regain. The goal is to
identify best practices for weight regain prevention. Data are from randomized
controlled trials in which program duration was longer than 6 months and the
efficacy of a maintenance program was assessed relative to no follow-up
support, placebo, or a comparative maintenance intervention group. Trials were
identified through a keyMesh search on PubMed for "weight loss
maintenance" and "weight regain prevention" and bibliography
reviews of identified articles. The outcomes reported are statistically
significant group differences in weight reduction, percentage of initial
weight loss maintained, and net effect of the intervention on percentage of
weight reduction. If not reported, percentage of weight reduction was
calculated from baseline weight and the amount of weight lost; the percentage
of weight loss maintained was calculated from initial weight lost and amount
of weight loss maintained; and the intervention effect was calculated as the
arithmetic mean difference in percentage of weight reduction. Baseline weight
was not reported in three studies, and weight loss in kilograms was presented
instead.
The third section identifies risk factors for weight regain and strategies
used by successful weight loss maintainers. Data are from reports based on
population surveys including the National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES) for
1999-2002,14,17
Consumer
Reports,18 and
Consumer and Health Styles
2004;19,20
the National Control Registry for Weight Control (NWCR), a longitudinal
database containing information on > 4,000 self-selected individuals who
have maintained a weight loss 13.6 kg for at least 1
year;21 and posthoc
analyses of randomized controlled trials.
 |
Long-Term Efficacy of Weight Loss Programs
|
|---|
The mainstays of weight loss therapy include diet, exercise, behavioral
therapy, and pharmacological therapy. Although the duration of programs
varies, maximal weight loss occurs in the first 6 months of
therapy.22,23
The short- and long-term efficacy of weight loss programs is presented in
Table 1. With the exception of
continuous pharmacological therapy, the pattern of weight regain is evident
from 6 months on.
 |
Diet restriction
|
|---|
Calorie restriction programs restrict caloric intake by 300-500 kcal/day
and fat calories to < 30% of daily caloric consumption. The expected rate
of weight loss is 0.5-1.0 lb/week. In a review of 51 diet restriction
programs, weight reductions at 6 months averaged 5% of baseline
weight.22 By 2 and
3 years, weight reductions averaged 4.4 and 3%, respectively.
 |
Diet and exercise
|
|---|
Diet-only programs have proven more effective than exercise-only programs
for inducing clinically significant levels of weight
loss.22 Yet,
exercise can enhance the amount of weight loss achieved from
dieting.22,24
A meta-analysis of 17 trials demonstrates that average weight reductions for
combined programs are 8.5% at 6 months and 4% at 4
years.22
Nonetheless, reversion to baseline weight is predicted by 5.5 years; a steady
rate of regain is observed from 6 months
on.25 The pattern
of weight regain is slower in patients without diabetes and in those
participating in induction programs that recommend fewer calories per day.
 |
Low-calorie diets
|
|---|
Low-calorie diets (LCDs) restrict caloric intake to 800-1600 kcal/day. A
meta-analysis of formalized LCD programs estimates average weight loss at 6
months to be 9.7% of baseline
weight.26 By 1 and
2 years, weight reductions average 5%. Altering the macronutrient composition
of LCDs to be very-low-fat or low-carbohydrate diets has not enhanced
long-term weight loss
outcomes.27,28
 |
Meal replacements
|
|---|
Meal replacement (MR) programs are often prescribed by physicians, but
trials examining their efficacy have only emerged in the past 10
years.29 During
weight loss, all or the majority of meals are replaced. In the maintenance
phase of care, meal replacements are gradually titrated down and replaced with
a sensible diet. Although calories are restricted within the range of LCD
programs, MRs are thought to improve diet adherence by removing calorie
counting and portion control from the patient's control. In a review of MR
programs with a duration of 3 months or longer, weight losses at 6 months and
1 year averaged 9.6 and 7.5% of baseline weight,
respectively.30 Two
meta-analyses have demonstrated that MR programs are more effective than LCDs
for maintaining weight loss at 1
year;22,30
the net difference in weight loss maintained at 1 year was 2.6 kg in favor of
MR.30
 |
Very-low-calorie diets
|
|---|
Very-low-calorie diets (VLCDs) are intensive diet programs that must be
supervised by a
physician.31 Daily
caloric intake is restricted to 400-800 kcal/day, often via a liquid diet for
up to 4 months. VLCDs are associated with rapid weight loss—16% weight
reductions are commonly observed at 6 months—followed by rapid weight
regain.22,26,32
Six trials have directly compared the efficacy of VLCD to LCD programs for
weight loss. In these programs, continuous use of an LCD was compared to a
sequential regimen of a VLCD followed by an LCD. A meta-analysis of these
studies demonstrates that the initial net benefit derived from a VLCD
diminishes over time such that group differences were not statistically
significant at 2
years.26
 |
Behavioral therapy
|
|---|
Behavioral therapy, in combination with diet and exercise, is highly
effective at inducing weight
loss.6 The goal of
behavioral therapy is to promote weight loss through changes in diet and
activity level. Standard behavioral therapy (SBT) programs are generally
provided in a group setting, led by a dietitian or health psychologist, and
focused on stimulus control, self-monitoring of diet, physical activity and
weight, and nutrition counseling, among other
topics.23 Average
duration of SBT programs is 4-6 months. In a review of nine programs, weight
reductions averaged 10% at 6 months and 8% at 18
months.23 Follow-up
data are sparse. A separate study found that that at 2 and 4 years, weight
reductions approached 3.8 and 1.8 kg,
respectively.12
 |
Commercial weight loss programs
|
|---|
Weight Watchers is the only commercial program to report data from
randomized controlled
trials.33 In a
multicenter trial, participants randomly assigned to a Weight Watchers program
lost significantly more weight than a self-help control
group.34 For the
Weight Watchers group, weight reductions of 4.6% were maintained at 1 year,
and reductions of 3% were maintained at 2 years. Between-group differences in
percentage of weight reduction averaged 3% at both time points. In a second
study, individualized support from a dietitian greatly enhanced weight
outcomes among Weight Watchers participants; 60% of those receiving dietitian
support achieved 10% weight reductions at 1
year.35 Follow-up
data are not available.
 |
Weight loss medication
|
|---|
Orlistat and sibutramine are the only two drugs approved by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) for long-term treatment of
obesity.36 A recent
trial demonstrated that the efficacy of pharmacological treatment for obesity
is enhanced when medication use is combined with a lifestyle program focused
on diet, exercise, and behavioral
therapy.37
Published meta-analyses, however, pool data from trials that provided
adjunctive lifestyle programs and those that did not. In a meta-analysis of 20
trials, pharmacological therapy ± adjunctive support induced an 8% body
weight reduction by 6
months.22 Weight
loss hit a plateau at 6 months. With continued medication use, however, 7-11%
body weight reductions were maintained for up to 3 years. A second
meta-analysis demonstrated that pharmacologically treated patients were three
times as likely as those solely relying on lifestyle programs to maintain
clinically significant weight losses for 1-2
years.24 Weight
regain, however, often occurs after medication
discontinuation.36
 |
Weight Loss Maintenance Programs
|
|---|
The goal of weight loss maintenance programs is to prevent weight regain
after weight loss. Programs can be classified by approach: sequential
medication use, sequential dieting, individualized follow-up support, or
group-based follow-up support. This section provides an overview of the
long-term outcomes of randomized controlled trials of weight regain prevention
programs (Table 2).
 |
Sequential medication
|
|---|
Sequential medication use appears to be an effective strategy for delaying
rapid weight regain. In each of the eight trials identified, maintenance-phase
medication use improved end-of-program weight loss maintenance outcomes over
placebo.29,38-44
Weight reductions averaged 2-6% greater among those receiving
maintenance-phase medication compared to placebo. Sequential medication use
induced additional weight loss in three
trials.39,40,44
and slowed the pattern of weight regain in the other five
trials.29,38,41-43
Neither the type of induction therapy nor the amount of weight initially lost
appears to explain this differential effect. Most troubling, however, is that
intervention effects appear to diminish rapidly after medication
discontinuation,40
and dose reduction does not appear to be an effective
alternative.29
Incidentally, addition of a second weight loss medication during the
maintenance phase does not appear to produce a synergistic
effect.45
 |
Sequential dieting
|
|---|
Although sequential dieting is common in the literature—low-calorie
diets often follow very-low-calorie diets; partial meal replacements often
follow meal replacement diets—few trials have accessed the efficacy of
sequential dieting for prevention of weight regain. Findings from one trial
suggest that optional food provision is not an effective weight regain
prevention
strategy.12 Three
other trials have assessed the relative efficacy of sequential dieting
approaches for preventing weight regain. Within the context of group follow-up
support, sequential dieting with a low-carbohydrate diet was equally as
effective as a low-fat
diet;46 an MR was
equally effective as
orlistat;47 and an
MR was equally effective as an
LCD48 for
supporting weight regain prevention at program completion. In all of these
trials, 90-100% of initial weight losses were maintained at program
completion.
Given the multi-component design of these trials, it is difficult to assess
the relative contribution of sequential dieting to weight regain prevention.
Moreover, follow-up data are only available from one trial, and significant
weight regain was evident after discontinuation of maintenance
support.48
 |
Individual follow-up support
|
|---|
In terms of individual follow-up support, telephone contact has received
the most attention in the literature and appears to be effective, especially
after group induction therapy and when provided by a therapist. In all
identified trials, the trend was for telephone support to improve weight loss
maintenance outcomes over no maintenance contact. Group differences only
reached statistical significance in three of the seven study groups
identified.49,50
In these programs, end-of-program weight reductions averaged 2-7% greater for
those receiving telephone support compared to no maintenance care. Telephone
maintenance support after relapse prevention training produced the largest
benefit over usual maintenance care, and benefits were sustained 6 months
after discontinuation of maintenance
contact.49
In contrast to traditional behavioral therapy, relapse prevention training
(RPT) acknowledges that lapses in self-care behavior are
inevitable.51 The
focus of RPT is thus to teach anticipatory planning and coping
techniques.52 It is
hypothesized that individualized follow-up support enhances outcomes by
enabling new skill
assimilation.49
Telephone support after group-based induction, including behavioral therapy
and nonbehavioral therapy, have also enhanced weight loss maintenance
outcomes.49,50
Notably, nontherapist
contact12 and
telephone contact after a telephone-based induction
program53,54
or individualized cognitive behavioral
therapy55 have not
proven effective for supporting weight regain prevention.
In addition to the telephone, other routes of delivery of individualized
follow-up support have been explored in the weight regain prevention
literature. One trial assessed the efficacy of an onsite stepped-care
approach; after a group-based induction program, participants were eligible to
receive individualized problem solving training during the maintenance phase
of care if they regained > 1% of baseline
weight.56 Although
the stepped-care program did prevent weight regain per se, among those who
regained > 1%, those who received individualized problem-solving training
greatly benefited from the stepped-care approach. Other trials found that an
interactive
website50 and
mail-based maintenance
support53,54
were no more effective than a self-directed maintenance program or usual care
for supporting weight regain prevention.
 |
Group follow-up support
|
|---|
Group follow-up support has been explored after weight loss induction via
medication, group behavioral therapy, and very-low-calorie diets. It has
additionally been provided to support weight regain prevention among
successful weight loss maintainers, that is, individuals that had lost and
successfully maintained > 10% weight reductions for at least 1 year.
Compared to induction only or usual maintenance care, the trend in all trials
was for group follow-up support to enhance weight loss maintenance outcomes at
both program completion and
thereafter.12,57-65
Group differences reached statistical significance in six of the 11 study
groups identified (P > 0.05 for group differences in weight change). In
these studies, end-of-program weight reductions averaged 2-7% greater for
those receiving group-based maintenance support compared to no support. Peer
group meetings with individualized therapist
contact60,61
and problem-solving
training63 produced
the greatest benefit over usual care, although behavioral therapy booster
meetings were also
effective.12
Programs of comparable duration have yet to determine the relative efficacy of
these programs for supporting weight regain prevention.
Maintenance programs based on relapse prevention training and peer group
meetings produced a delayed
benefit.59.62
Although no effect was demonstrated at program completion, 6-12 months later,
weight reductions were significantly greater among those who previously
received maintenance support than among those who had not. A weight-focused
maintenance program similarly produced a delayed benefit over an
exercise-focused maintenance
program.66
Internet delivery of group follow-up support has yet to be validated in the
literature. In one trial, Internet-based booster meetings delivered via
Internet chatrooms appeared to enhance weight loss maintenance outcomes
compared to a minimal contact and an onsite booster
group.64 Group
differences did not reach statistical significance, however. In another trial,
group-based Internet support offered to successful weight losers effectively
decreased the proportion of participants who regained weight; however, only
onsite support proved effective for minimizing the amount of weight regained
compared to a newsletter control group (P <
0.05).58
The utility of supplemental exercise programming during group-based
maintenance support has been assessed in three
trials.57,67,68
In each of these trials, induction therapy did not include a specific focus on
exercise; rather, exercise was introduced as a key strategy for weight loss
maintenance. In addition to group-based maintenance support, participants in
these programs were encouraged to meet energy expenditure goals via
participation in supervised and independent exercise programs. Exercise
expenditure goals were moderate in nature (1,000 kcal/week) and focused on
walking, cycling, and/or weight resistance training. Although the trend was
for supplemental exercise programming to enhance weight loss maintenance
outcomes compared to nonsupplemented maintenance support, group differences
did not reach statistical significance in any study.
Given the likelihood of rapid weight regain after medication
discontinuation and the desire of many patients to not use weight loss
medications indefinitely, there is a need to identify maintenance programs to
be used after medication discontinuation. One trial has addressed this
question.65
Compared to usual maintenance care, group follow-up support after
pharmacological treatment of obesity enhanced weight loss maintenance outcomes
at program completion (P < 0.05); weight reductions averaged 3% greater for
those who received group follow-up support compared to usual maintenance
care.65 Moreover,
100% of initial weight losses were maintained by those receiving group-based
follow-up support.
The trials identified in this review appear to support the assertion that
continued therapy, be it based on maintenance-phase medication, sequential
dieting with group follow-up support, individualized telephone support, or
group-based follow-up support, is effective for slowing or delaying weight
regain. Only one program identified—telephone support after relapse
prevention training—supported weight regain prevention during the life
of the maintenance program and new weight stabilization thereafter.
The long-term efficacy of other seemingly effective weight regain
prevention programs, such as group-based problem solving training or
sequential medication, is uncertain, because follow-up data have not been
reported. Preliminary evidence, however, suggests that rapid regain occurs
after discontinuation of maintenance medication.
In terms of relative efficacy of maintenance approaches, research is
limited. One trial demonstrated that within the context of a multi-component
program, sequential dieting with an MR was as effective as sequential
medication for supporting weight regain prevention. Further research on the
relative efficacy of maintenance approaches for supporting weight regain
prevention and new weight stabilization are needed.
 |
Factors Underlying Weight Regain and Weight Loss Maintenance
|
|---|
Some individuals are better able than others to maintain weight losses.
Factors underlying weight regain and weight loss maintenance have been
identified, and the former can be classified along a time axis
(Table 3). Factors are
clinical, psychological, and behavioral in nature.
 |
Weight regain
|
|---|
Pre-treatment indicators of future weight regain include older
age;69
Mexican-American
ethnicity;70
frequent previous diet
attempts;71,72
high baseline or maximum
weight;73-75
nonmedical triggers for weight loss
induction;76 binge
eating;77 dietary
disinhibition (loss of control while
eating);77,78
"all or nothing"
thinking;79
perceived barriers to exercise, including "too tired," "too
hard," "not enough time," and "no companion";
perceived barriers to diet, including "high cost of healthy foods"
and "eating away from home too
often";19,20
and lacking self-efficacy, motivation, realistic weight loss goals, and a
strong body
image.80
Post-weight loss indicators of weight regain include weight loss >
15-30% of baseline
weight;14,81
early regain;82 not
responding to early
regain;78
perceptions of
hunger;83
dissatisfaction with achieved weight
loss;80 dietary
disinhibition;81
emotional eating;78
binge eating; consuming a diet high in calories, fats, and
sugars;14 frequent
consumption of fast food (> 2-3 times per
week);20 a
sedentary lifestyle or decreased frequency and level of physical
activity;14 and
viewing more than 2-4 hours of television a
day.14 Although
somewhat counterintuitive, continuation of weight loss efforts is also
associated with weight
regain.16,73
 |
Weight loss maintenance
|
|---|
Studies of the NWCR of successful weight loss maintainers provide insight
into the transient course of successful weight loss maintenance. Among
successful weight loss maintainers, modest weight regain and weight
fluctuations are common, and recovery from regain > 2.6 kg is
difficult.81,84
During the first years of weight loss maintenance, continued effort and
attention to weight control is essential. By 2 years, however, maintainers
report less reliance on weight loss strategies and reduced attention and
effort to weight control, perhaps reflecting new habit
assimilation.85
Furthermore, maintenance of weight loss for 2 years is protective against
subsequent regain; by 2 years the likelihood of regaining 2.6 kg in the coming
year is only 50%; by 5 years the likelihood drops to
27%.81 Evidence
from the NHANES survey similarly supported the contention that among
successful weight loss maintainers, years from maximal weight loss is
protective against weight
regain.14
Studies of the NWCR identify eight behavioral strategies important for
weight loss
maintenance.21,77,86
These included maintaining high levels of physical activity and limiting
television viewing to less than a few hours a day; eating a diet low in
calories and fat; regularly consuming breakfast; maintaining a consistent
eating pattern throughout the week and year; reigning in emotional eating;
frequently monitoring weight; and catching slips before they turn into
large-scale weight gains. A Consumer Reports survey additionally identified
direct coping, (i.e. with stress and lapses in behavior) as opposed to
avoidance or emotional eating and help-seeking as important behaviors for
successful weight loss
maintenance.18
 |
Clinical Implications
|
|---|
The obesity literature has identified numerous weight loss induction
programs that are effective at inducing clinically significant levels of
weight loss. Diet and exercise, low-calorie diets, meal replacement,
behavioral therapy, and pharmacological agents are generally effective at
inducing 8-10% weight reductions by 6 months. VLCDs have demonstrated the
capacity to induce even larger weight losses. For all programs, maximal weight
loss occurs in the first 6 months of therapy. For all nonpharmacological
programs, weight regain begins shortly thereafter. On average, weight losses
at 2 years range between 3 and 6% for nonpharmacological therapies and between
7and 8% for pharmacological therapies. For individuals at risk, these outcomes
are within the range known to induce improvements in cardiovascular risk
factors and prevent type 2
diabetes.2,3
Weight loss maintenance programs identified in this review demonstrate that
sequential medication use and individual and group follow-up support are
effective for improving weight loss maintenance outcomes, predominantly by
slowing the pattern of weight regain. Only one program, telephone contact
after relapse prevention training, produced clinically significant benefits
that were sustained well after discontinuation of maintenance contact.
Although the ideal outcome of weight loss maintenance programs would be new
weight stabilization, delayed onset of weight regain is a second-best outcome.
The cardiovascular and metabolic health benefits associated with weight
reduction accrue in a dose-dependent fashion. Noncurative therapies are
streamlined into the treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia; acceptance of
continuous models of care for obesity may also be
necessary.12
Potential points of care to support weight regain prevention are
high-lighted in Table 4.
Patients often expect to lose 20-30% of body
weight.87-89
On average, patients are only achieving half of this goal and are not
sustaining it for much longer than 6 months. The impact of unrealistic weight
loss goals on weight loss maintenance is
uncertain.80.87.89-92
Satisfaction with weight loss attained, however, predicts weight loss
maintenance
success.79,92,93
Patient education on the health benefits from modest weight reductions may
serve to promote patient satisfaction with weight loss achieved, and in turn,
support weight loss maintenance.
|