Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Clinical Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • Clinical Compendia
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • Clinical Compendia
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
Departments

The Business of Insulin Pumps in Diabetes Care: Clinical and Economic Considerations

  1. Soraya Jane Kanakis, PharmD,
  2. Carolyn Watts, PhD and
  3. Steven B. Leichter, MD, FACP, FACE
    Clinical Diabetes 2002 Oct; 20(4): 214-216. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.20.4.214
    PreviousNext
    • Article
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Loading

    Insulin pumps provide one of three commercially available technologies for insulin delivery. In comparison to syringe-injected insulin and pen-injected insulin, continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via an insulin pump is perceived and marketed to be the most sophisticated and flexible method of providing insulin therapy.1,2

    Professional and consumer information programs provided by insulin pump manufacturers in the United States have emphasized that this flexibility and sophistication may result in enhanced glycemic control and improved quality of life for insulin-requiring diabetic patients. People who use insulin pumps are said to enjoy increased discretion in daily living patterns compared to those using other forms of insulin administration. There is also a perception among at least some health care professionals and consumers that CSII can help achieve enhanced glycemic control with a reduced risk of hypoglycemic events.

    These impressions have led to substantial growth in the market for insulin pumps during the two decades since their introduction. Because of its perceived sophistication and flexibility, CSII was included in the intensive therapy protocols of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT).3

    However, CSII should not be considered without appropriate caveats. The annual costs of this therapy, including periodic replacement of pumps with “upgrades,” may be substantially higher than those of other forms of insulin administration. In at least some patient subgroups, pump use may have no positive effect on clinical status or may even worsen it.4

    Because other forms of insulin administration, particularly pen injection devices, are now being advocated more widely, the evidence of clinical benefit and relative costs of these methods of insulin delivery assume greater importance, in terms of both health policy and individual treatment.

    Costs of Pump Therapy

    Cost can be a formidable obstacle to CSII therapy. The most popular insulin pumps and initial supplies, including tubing, syringes, cartridges, and dressings, cost more than $5,000 (Tables 1 and 2). The infusion set and catheters must be purchased regularly for as long as CSII is used, at an annual cost of approximately $1,500. Most insurance companies, including Medicare and Medicaid plans, cover the cost of CSII after prospective approval.5 However, patients whose plans cover 80% of the total cost may still face substantial initial and recurrent out-of-pocket expenses.

    CSII therapy poses financial issues for providers, as well. Initiating this type of treatment requires a substantial investment of time and effort to assess patient suitability and to teach proper pump use. CSII also necessitates an increase in office visitation, both before and after therapy initiation, to adjust insulin dosages. Insurance coverage for these services is variable. Some providers manage to secure from health plans a “global fee” that includes coverage of these services. Most others attempt with varying degrees of success to cover these costs by properly applying standard evaluation and management codes for office visits.

    Ongoing maintenance costs of CSII therapy are not necessarily greater than those of pen-injected insulin therapy, excluding the annual amortization of the depreciation of the pump itself (see Table 2). Both forms of insulin delivery are more than twice as expensive as syringe-injected insulin therapy.

    Overall, though, CSII is the most expensive option when the amortized depreciation of the pump is added into the equation. Although no clear data are available regarding how often patients upgrade their insulin pumps, our experience suggests that this change occurs approximately every 5 years. Pump upgrades are available for a discounted fee compared to the original acquisition costs. Thus, annual depreciation adds approximately $250.00 to the yearly cost of care for CSII therapy.

    The Insulin Pump Market

    The actual clinical use of insulin pumps in the United States is poorly understood. Approximately 162,000 people are registered with the major manufacturers. However, there are no data regarding how many of these patients are still actively using their pumps.

    There is a vague notion that most people who purchase insulin pumps are Caucasian, relatively better-educated, and more affluent than the overall population of Americans with diabetes. Health care professionals who have diabetes seem to prefer CSII therapy over other forms of insulin delivery for their own treatment.6

    Medtronic Minimed pumps dominate the market in the United States, whereas Disetronic pumps are predominant in other countries. Although the insulin pump market has slowed recently, total sales of pumps and related supplies are now thought to exceed $1 billion per year.7–9

    Clinical Outcomes

    Whether more sophisticated insulin delivery methods, such as pumps or pens, enhance diabetes control is not clearly understood. Although a subgroup of the DCCT’s intensively treated patients were on CSII, no data showing a clear advantage of this therapy over multiple daily injections were published. DCCT researchers compared the quality of life of intensively treated subjects with that of conventionally treated subjects and noted no significant differences.10 This applied to subjects using CSII as well as those using syringe-injected insulin.

    A meta-review of all published experience with insulin pumps has recently been offered by Pickup and Keen.11 They observed no clear evidence that CSII significantly enhanced glycemic control, but they did note data suggesting that CSII offers intense control with lower risks of hypoglycemic events and greater dosing flexibility than syringe-injected insulin therapy.

    Other studies have tended to confirm what clinicians anecdotally report on individual patients: that specific patients have very positive experiences with CSII, which lead to enhanced glycemic control and improved quality of life.12 This impression is substantiated by at least one other study suggesting that results vary widely among individual patients.4 Relying on the results of large-group studies to predict CSII results in individual patients may, therefore, be unwise. Although we have no reliable means of predicting whether a specific patient will substantially benefit from CSII therapy, some patients clearly do benefit.

    Perhaps surprisingly, the data on pen-injected insulin are less favorable than those on insulin pumps. Jehle et al.13 reported inadequacy in the suspension of NPH insulin in cartridges for pen injection. There has also been a brief report on patients experiencing acute deterioration in glycemic control when switched from syringe injections to pen injections.14 However, as with CSII, Graff and McClanahan15 reported better patient acceptance and fewer omissions of insulin doses with pen- versus syringe-injected insulin therapy.

    Conclusions

    This perspective on the three available technologies for insulin administration suggests that pen-injected insulin therapy and CSII therapy are both associated with higher costs than is syringe-injected insulin therapy. When equipment costs are added to the cost of supplies, CSII is only slightly more expensive than pen-injected insulin therapy on an annual basis.

    Data in favor of these newer forms of insulin administration are most substantial in relation to patient acceptance, flexibility of injection regimen, and reduction in omissions of scheduled doses. In contrast to widespread perceptions of CSII, which are encouraged by the marketing efforts of pump manufacturers, there is no clear evidence that CSII therapy enhances glycemic control compared to other forms of insulin therapy.

    CSII does, however, appear to reduce the risks of hypoglycemia for the same level of control and, as with pens, may help more patients accept intensive insulin therapy. Because CSII lends itself to intensive management of hyperglycemia, positive public perceptions regarding insulin pumps may aid in the advocacy of strict glycemic control for people with insulin-requiring diabetes.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1.

    Initial Costs Associated With Insulin Pump Use

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2.

    Annual Costs Associated With Available Insulin Delivery Technologies

    Footnotes

    • Soraya Jane Kanakis, PharmD, is a clinical pharmacist at Virginia Mason Medical Center and a master’s degree candidate in Health Administration at the University of Washington in Seattle. Carolyn Watts, PhD, is a professor of health economics and health policy in the Department of Health Services with adjunct appointments in the Department of Economics and the Evans School of Public Affairs at the University of Washington in Seattle. Steven B. Leichter, MD, FACP, FACE, is co-director of the Institute for Healthcare Leadership in Columbus, Ga., and a professor of medicine at Mercer University School of Medicine in Macon, Ga.

    • American Diabetes Association

    References

    1. ↵
    2. ↵
    3. ↵
      http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pubs/complications/benefit.htm, April 2002
    4. ↵
      Leichter SB, Schreiner ME, Reynolds LR, Bolick T: A long-term follow-up of diabetic patients on insulin pumps: considerations for future clinical application. Arch Intern Med 145:1409–1412, 1985
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    5. ↵
      http://www.minimed.com/corpinfo/rpt_00/files/pg7.htm, February 2002
    6. ↵
      Graff MR, Rubin RR, Walker EA: How diabetes specialists treat their own diabetes: findings from a study of the AADE and ADA membership. Diabetes Educ 26:460–467, 2000
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    7. ↵
      http://www.diabetesnet.com/news/news070499.html, February 2002
    8. Interim Report for Disetronic Holding AG. 2001/02, February, 2002
    9. ↵
      http://www.buscom.com/biotech/C050N.html, February, 2002
    10. ↵
      The DCCT Research Group: Influence of intensive diabetes treatment on quality-of-life outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes Care 19:195–203, 1996
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    11. ↵
      Pickup J, Keen H: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion at 25 years: evidence base for the expanding use of insulin pump therapy in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25:593–598, 2002
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      Saudek CD: Novel forms of insulin delivery. Endocrinol Clin North Am 26:597–610, 1997
      OpenUrl
    13. ↵
      Jehle PM, Micheler C, Jehle DR, Breitig D, Boehm BO: Inadequate suspension of neutral protamine Hagendorn (NPH) insulin in pens. Lancet 354:1604–1607, 1999
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      Albareda M, Balmes L, Wagner A, Corcoy R: Insulin pens and acute deterioration in blood glucose control (Letter). Arch Intern Med 159:100, 1999
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      Graff MR, McClanahan MA: Assessment by patients with diabetes mellitus of two insulin pen delivery systems versus a vial and syringe. Clin Ther 20:486–496, 1998
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this Issue

    October 2002, 20(4)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by Author
    Sign up to receive current issue alerts
    View Selected Citations (0)
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Clinical Diabetes.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    The Business of Insulin Pumps in Diabetes Care: Clinical and Economic Considerations
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Diabetes
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Clinical Diabetes web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    The Business of Insulin Pumps in Diabetes Care: Clinical and Economic Considerations
    Soraya Jane Kanakis, Carolyn Watts, Steven B. Leichter
    Clinical Diabetes Oct 2002, 20 (4) 214-216; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.20.4.214

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Add to Selected Citations
    Share

    The Business of Insulin Pumps in Diabetes Care: Clinical and Economic Considerations
    Soraya Jane Kanakis, Carolyn Watts, Steven B. Leichter
    Clinical Diabetes Oct 2002, 20 (4) 214-216; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.20.4.214
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Costs of Pump Therapy
      • The Insulin Pump Market
      • Clinical Outcomes
      • Conclusions
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Transitioning to Fixed-Ratio Combination Therapy: Five Frequently Asked Questions Health Care Providers Should Anticipate From Their Patients
    • Gvoke HypoPen: An Auto-Injector Containing an Innovative, Liquid-Stable Glucagon Formulation for Use in Severe Acute Hypoglycemia
    • Timely News and Notes for Primary Care Providers from the American Diabetes Association
    Show more Departments

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Abridged Standards of Care
    • Archives
    • Submit
    • Subscribe
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds

    More Information

    • About the Journal
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertising
    • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
    • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
    • Contact Us

    Other ADA Resources

    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
    • Professional Books
    • Diabetes Forecast

     

    • DiabetesJournals.org
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • ADA's DiabetesPro
    • ADA Member Directory
    • Diabetes.org

    © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Clinical Diabetes Print ISSN: 0891-8929, Online ISSN: 1945-4953.