Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Clinical Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
Departments

Increasing Monofilament Examinations as a Means of Teaching Quality Improvement

  1. Annie Whitney, MS,
  2. Brittany Bohinc, MD,
  3. Martin Butler, MD,
  4. Debra Bynum, MD,
  5. Robb Malone, PharmD,
  6. Darren DeWalt, MD, MPH and
  7. Michael Pignone, MD, MPH
    Clinical Diabetes 2008 Oct; 26(4): 167-169. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.26.4.167
    PreviousNext
    • Article
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Loading

    The North Carolina Area Health Education Centers (AHEC) program has the mission of meeting “the state's health and health workforce needs by providing educational programs in partnership with academic institutions, health care agencies, and other organizations committed to improving the health of the people of North Carolina.” Traditionally, the educational programs have focused on providing lectures on a variety of medical topics, chosen through partnerships between the AHEC's constituents and faculty at the state's medical schools.

    Recently, there has been an increasing appreciation that lecture-based curriculums alone are relatively ineffective for improving quality of care. Greater attention has been focused on developing and implementing curriculums that seek to blend knowledge transmission and the development of skills in practice change. The Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education is requiring all providers of category one continuing medical education credits to incorporate practice improvement methodology into 50% of their programs by 2010, with a proposed increase to 100% by 2012. To make AHEC-based curriculums more effective, we sought to test a longitudinal, skills-based curriculum that would use the topic of diabetes to teach quality improvement (QI) techniques to AHEC constituents.

    We chose to conduct a pilot test of this new curriculum in partnership with the Southeast AHEC (SEAHEC) based in Wilmington, N.C. As part of its mission, SEAHEC oversees residencies in internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and surgery. The Department of Internal Medicine consists of six faculty and 23 residents. Its internal medicine clinic sees 40-60 patients per clinic session, with five to seven clinic sessions per week. The number of patients with diabetes varies, ranging from 3 to 17 per clinic session in the period of data collection for this project.

    Pilot Project

    Initially, a project charter was developed with input from the University of North Carolina (UNC) and SEAHEC medicine faculty. The charter outlined goals and plans for the curriculum series. The overall objective was “to improve the care of patients with diabetes by reviewing core topics in diabetes care, measuring performance, implementing reliable care processes, and gaining momentum for ongoing improvement after the end of the series.” We recommended picking one area of diabetes care and focusing on one measure. The group would then use repeated, small-scale measurement to drive improvement. At each meeting, a UNC faculty member would present a lecture on a particular topic at a Grand Rounds session and then meet with a smaller group of SEAHEC faculty and staff participating in the improvement project. The lecture topics included an overview of QI methods, cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with diabetes, blood pressure control in diabetes, diet and exercise, foot care, and glycemic control. Each lecture reviewed current best practice evidence, as well as improvement strategies, including improvement experiences from the UNC internal medicine clinic.1 The team meetings took place in a nearby conference room and were attended by two to five SEAHEC faculty and residents. Nurses and staff from the practice were invited but were not able to attend regularly.

    The first meeting (October 2007) reviewed key components of QI, goals of the series, recommendations for measures, and a brief outline for improvement activities. The SEAHEC group was asked to perform a self-assessment by gathering data on multiple diabetes measures during one week. This activity helped them recognize that they did not have a method to easily identify patients with diabetes. The assessment showed that they were doing well in some areas (90% had an A1C test in the past year) and had room to improve on others (12% had a documented eye exam, and 32% had a documented monofilament exam in past year).

    The assessment was reviewed at the December 2007 meeting, and the team decided to focus on an area with low performance. The team considered monofilament examination and eye examination. Eye examination was not chosen because of the need for outside referrals; monofilament examination was considered a better target because it was almost entirely within the control of the practice. After the meeting, the group identified a medical intern (BB) to join the project and lead the data collection.

    Their proposal for intervention included participation of both nurses and resident physicians. Nurses would identify patients with a “diabetes” sticker on the chart and a “date of monofilament exam” sticker on the intake sheet. The nurses would ask patients the date of their last foot exam and ask them to remove their socks and shoes. Signs would be posted in exam rooms asking patients to leave their socks and shoes off. The resident physicians were alerted to note the diabetes sticker and perform the monofilament exam as an integral part of the visit. A sign posted in the physicians' room reminded residents to document the monofilament exam in their clinic notes.

    The group planned to initiate its intervention and collect data for 2 weeks beginning in January 2008. Because of a shortage of attending physician coverage affecting the availability of the lead faculty member, implementation and data collection was delayed until February 2008. Charts were collected and assessed for correct identification by diabetes sticker, completion of a monofilament exam at all, and completion of correctly administered monofilament examination (Figure 1).

    Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Monofilament examination rates

    In early March 2008, the team reviewed the data. At the end of the 2-week data collection, monofilament exam completion rates did improve. However, adherence rates to the proposed intervention by the residents were low. The project team felt that this was because of low “buy in” because the residents did not view monofilament exams as clinically important. There were also issues with incomplete data collection because only one person was performing the measurements. In mid-March 2008, the team proposed having nurses complete the monofilament exam. The nurses, however, had recently been given other new, higher-priority triage tasks to complete, so that idea was deferred. In late April 2008, data was collected during one clinic session and showed that the nurses' fidelity in placing the diabetes chart stickers remained high (> 70%), but the performance of monofilament exams by the resident physicians was lower (28%).

    Accomplishments

    Our pilot project met some of our goals, including reviewing core topics in diabetes care and QI concepts. However, we were less successful in producing sustained change in practice. The SEAHEC team was able to assess overall performance and collect real-time data after initiating their intervention. Although the data were reviewed by the project team, they were not used to refine the intervention. The improvement team experienced barriers that many groups face when undertaking quality initiatives, such as low group buy-in and a shortage of personnel and time devoted to project work.

    Although limitations in resources may seem to be a major obstacle to improvement, successful improvement often is more dependent on realignment and refinement of relationships and duties than on garnering additional personnel or equipment. For example, the lack of direct involvement in planning by the nurses and staff may have affected the nature of the intervention and its likelihood of success. Additionally, a more intensive training (beyond the lectures and team meetings used as part of this project) may be required to help produce robust improvements.

    Although we were unable to use continuous measurement to drive the improvement process through multiple PDSA (plan-do-study-act) cycles, the team did gain valuable experience performing improvement work and insight into the culture needed to support its success. Indeed, it appears that they have gained momentum for future improvement activities, because they are exploring opportunities to work with a local initiative on a future diabetes QI project.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to acknowledge Megan J. Engelen, DO, for assistance in data collection for this project.

    Footnotes

    • Annie Whitney, MS, is coordinator of the University of North Carolina internal medicine diabetes disease management program; Debra Bynum, MD, is an assistant professor of medicine; Robb Malone, PharmD, is an assistant professor of pharmacy; Darren DeWalt, MD, MPH, is an assistant professor of medicine; and Michael Pignone, MD, MPH, is the division chief and an associate professor of medicine in the Department of Medicine at the University of North Carolina—Chapel Hill. Brittany Bohinc, MD, is a resident physician, and Martin Butler, MD, is an assistant professor of medicine in the Department of Medicine at Southeast Area Health Education Center, in Wilmington, N.C. Dr. Pignone is also an associate editor of Clinical Diabetes.

    • American Diabetes Association

    References

    1. ↵
      Malone RM, Bryant Shilliday ME, Ives TJ, Pignone MP: Development and evolution of a primary care-based diabetes disease management program. Clin Diabetes 25:31 -35, 2007
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this Issue

    October 2008, 26(4)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by Author
    Sign up to receive current issue alerts
    View Selected Citations (0)
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Clinical Diabetes.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Increasing Monofilament Examinations as a Means of Teaching Quality Improvement
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Diabetes
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Clinical Diabetes web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Increasing Monofilament Examinations as a Means of Teaching Quality Improvement
    Annie Whitney, Brittany Bohinc, Martin Butler, Debra Bynum, Robb Malone, Darren DeWalt, Michael Pignone
    Clinical Diabetes Oct 2008, 26 (4) 167-169; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.26.4.167

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Add to Selected Citations
    Share

    Increasing Monofilament Examinations as a Means of Teaching Quality Improvement
    Annie Whitney, Brittany Bohinc, Martin Butler, Debra Bynum, Robb Malone, Darren DeWalt, Michael Pignone
    Clinical Diabetes Oct 2008, 26 (4) 167-169; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.26.4.167
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • Pilot Project
      • Accomplishments
      • Acknowledgments
      • Footnotes
      • References
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    Departments

    • Case Reports on Diabetes-Related Outcomes for Pregnant Women in the National Diabetes Prevention Program
    • Transitioning to Fixed-Ratio Combination Therapy: Five Frequently Asked Questions Health Care Providers Should Anticipate From Their Patients
    • Gvoke HypoPen: An Auto-Injector Containing an Innovative, Liquid-Stable Glucagon Formulation for Use in Severe Acute Hypoglycemia
    Show more Departments

    Bridges to Excellence

    • Specialty Group Medical Visits for Patients With Diabetes
    • Development and Implementation of a U-500 Regular Insulin Program in a Federally Qualified Health Center
    • Exploring Approaches to Facilitate Diabetes Therapy Intensification in Primary Care
    Show more Bridges to Excellence

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Abridged Standards of Care
    • Archives
    • Submit
    • Subscribe
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds

    More Information

    • About the Journal
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertising
    • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
    • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
    • Contact Us

    Other ADA Resources

    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
    • Professional Books
    • Diabetes Forecast

     

    • DiabetesJournals.org
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • ADA's DiabetesPro
    • ADA Member Directory
    • Diabetes.org

    © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Clinical Diabetes Print ISSN: 0891-8929, Online ISSN: 1945-4953.