Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Clinical Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • Clinical Compendia
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • Clinical Compendia
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
Features

Health Care Disparities and Diabetes Care: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Providers

  1. Richard O. White, MD,
  2. Bettina M. Beech, DrPH, MPH and
  3. Stephania Miller, PhD
    Clinical Diabetes 2009 Jul; 27(3): 105-112. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.27.3.105
    PreviousNext
    • Article
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF
    Loading

    IN BRIEF

    Disparities in diabetes care are prevalent in the United States. This article provides an overview of these disparities and discusses both potential causes and efforts to address them to date. The authors focus the discussion on aspects relevant to the patient-provider dyad and provide practical considerations for the primary care provider's role in helping to diminish and eliminate disparities in diabetes care.

    Ever since the Institute of Medicine issued its 2002 report titled, “Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care,”1 there has been a steady increase in the awareness, measurement, and documentation of disparate health care trends across America. Health care disparities have been defined as, “[differences] in the overall rate of disease incidence, prevalence, morbidity, mortality, or survival rates in [a given subpopulation] as compared to the health status of the general population.”2 Health care disparities can be broadly classified as either differences in the quality of care received or in access to care. In general, these disparities encompass a broad spectrum of disease processes and result from a complex interplay of multiple factors.

    Despite some recent successes in narrowing disparate gaps in care among select populations,3 the reduction or elimination of most health disparities has remained elusive to providers, researchers, and policy-makers. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has recognized several priority groups as targets for addressing disparities. These include racial and ethnic minorities, women, children, low-income groups, the elderly, residents of rural areas, and individuals with disabilities.4

    Diabetes care represents an important area of national focus as efforts continue toward eliminating health care disparities and improving the overall health of all Americans. With that in mind, the goals of this article are to: 1) provide an overview of disparities specific to the care of patients with diabetes, 2) highlight some of the potential causes of these disparities while providing an overview of past and current efforts to address them, and 3) provide considerations for the primary care provider's role in helping to reduce and eliminate disparate trends in diabetes care.

    The current prevalence of diabetes in the United States is startling, with nearly 24 million affected individuals (~ 8% of the U.S. population) and another 57 million individuals (~ 19% of the U.S. population) believed to be at considerable clinical risk of developing diabetes (i.e., having pre-diabetes).5 Racial and ethnic minorities are known to carry a disproportionate burden of diabetes, with the prevalence among African Americans at ~ 12% and that of non-white Hispanics at ~ 11%, compared to whites, whose overall prevalence is ~ 7%.5

    As the population continues to age and becomes increasingly diverse, the number of individuals with diabetes is expected to increase unless the current trajectory is interrupted. This is an important consideration because diabetes has been identified as the sixth-leading cause of death nationally,6 and the annual costs directly attributed to the care of patients with diabetes are estimated to be $174 billion.7

    Significant disparities in both the processes of care and health outcomes relevant to diabetes management persist across the country. According to the most recent National Healthcare Disparities Report (NHDR), the proportion of patients with diabetes who had all three annual services recommended by the American Diabetes Association (i.e., appropriate measurement of A1C, retinal eye exams, and foot exams) in the past year was significantly lower for poor to middle-income individuals, Hispanics, and those without at least some college education compared to their respective comparison groups. Lower-extremity amputation rates among patients with diabetes have also been consistently higher among African Americans, Hispanics, and those who live in communities with median incomes < $45,000.3

    As a nation in general, we are doing poorly in terms of the overall quality of glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid control among patients with diabetes.8-10 For example, during the years 1999-2004, only 48.7% of patients with diabetes met the recommended A1C goal of < 7%, and 56.6% of patients reported blood pressures < 140/80 mmHg. Within this context, nonetheless, both African Americans and Mexican Americans had significantly less likelihood of having an A1C < 7% compared to whites, and African Americans and those classified as poor to middle income had significantly fewer individuals at goal blood pressure.

    It should be noted that blood pressure estimates for this period were based on previous recommendations that have since been updated (i.e., a blood pressure goal of < 135/80 mmHg),11 suggesting a potential underestimate of the current disparate gap in blood pressure control.3 On a brighter note, when cholesterol control was examined for the same time period, there were no longer any statistically significant racial differences, and the previous gap between high-income and poor individuals with diabetes had been closed. Nonetheless, the overall rates of cholesterol control (i.e., total cholesterol < 200 mg/dl) also remain poor, with only 48.2% of adults meeting recommended goals.12,13

    Most practicing clinicians know that dietary and physical activity counseling are imperative to the care of patients with diabetes. Unfortunately, the NHDR in 2007 also showed that significantly fewer Hispanics, African Americans, lower-income individuals, and individuals with less than a high school education were told by their physician that they were overweight. Similarly, obese individuals who were Hispanic, poor, had less than a high school education, or were uninsured were significantly less likely to be given instructions from their physician on physical activity.3 These results, although not specific to the population with diabetes, should be taken into consideration when thinking about disparities in diabetes care. Table 1 provides a brief list of selected studies that further highlight disparities in diabetes care that affect each of the aforementioned AHRQ priority groups.

    The U.S. health care system seems to be moving increasingly toward a model in which health organizations and, to a certain extent, individual providers will be judged based on their ability to provide care that is effective, safe, timely, patient-centered, equitable, and efficient.14 “Equitable” refers to the non-differential delivery of care regardless of patient characteristics. Addressing all six of these factors may seem like an impractically tall order for busy practitioners who have existed to date in an environment where revenue is primarily based on volume and fee-for-service as opposed to being based on performance. Nonetheless, these new potential standards reflect a growing recognition of the need for change in the way health care delivery is provided and evaluated.

    What are some of the potential causes of disparities in diabetes care, and what has been done to address them? To answer these questions, this discussion focuses on both components of a patient-provider dyad, highlighting characteristics that may partially explain the observed disparate trends in diabetes care. Both members of this dyad have been shown conceptually to have an important and interrelated impact on disparities within the larger context in which health disparities are believed to exist.15 These two entities are also most relevant to those who regularly attend to patients with diabetes, whether in primary care or specialty care settings.

    Patients with diabetes are known to play a vital role in their individual care in that much of their success hinges on the daily self-management of their chronic illness. Although it is true that differential access to care and patient-specific demographic factors such as education and income level partially account for disparate trends in care, there are still residual disparities in quality even after controlling for these variables.1 From a practical standpoint, when individual patients are nonadherent to treatment regimens, scheduled appointments, and instructions regarding diet and exercise, they are obviously more likely to have poorer diabetes-related outcomes.

    However, what providers often attribute to someone being a “difficult patient” very well could represent a manifestation of other intrinsic patient factors such as self-efficacy, disease knowledge, or health literacy or quantitative skills (i.e., numeracy). In 2004, the Institute of Medicine defined health literacy as “the degree to which individuals have the capacity to obtain, process, and understand basic information and services needed to make appropriate decisions regarding their health.”16 Numeracy is a component of health literacy and has simply been defined as “the ability to understand and use numbers in daily life.”17 There are more than 90 million Americans with basic or below-basic literacy skills and more than 110 million with basic or poor quantitative skills.18 Both health literacy and numeracy are important skills needed for successful diabetes self-management because patients are often required to interpret and apply dietary instructions, measure and dispense insulin, and quantify carbohydrate intake, among other tasks.19

    Several studies have linked low health literacy and numeracy to poorer diabetes knowledge and symptom recognition, poorer glycemic control, and lower self-efficacy or confidence in one's ability to self-manage.20-22 Also, low health literacy has been shown to be an independent predictor of how much patients benefit from a comprehensive diabetes management program.23 These “other” patient factors are not intuitively obvious, particularly during routine clinic visits, but they can be easily measured even in the time-pressured clinical setting.24-26 Additionally, patients have been shown to be amenable to such assessments without subsequent decreases in satisfaction.27

    Peek et al.28 recently published a comprehensive review of the literature summarizing interventions targeted at each of the two aforementioned members of our diabetes care dyad with the overall goal of reducing disparities in diabetes care. Each of the patient-targeted interventions in their analysis was an educational program centered on improving self-management behaviors, physical activity, or dietary practices.

    For example, Piette et al.29 enrolled English- and Spanish-speaking adult patients with diabetes into a randomized controlled trial in a primary care setting. They compared to usual care the added benefit of an automated telephone assessment system with nurse-guided patient follow-up to address identified barriers to self-care. Patients in their intervention arm demonstrated greater self-management activities, less frequent problems with medication adherence, and better glycemic control compared to the control group. In a brief subanalysis, the Spanish-speaking intervention patients in this study demonstrated even greater benefit (i.e., improvement in A1C, success in reaching goal A1C, and fewer diabetes-related symptoms) compared to the Spanish-speaking controls, suggesting ethnicity as a potential effect modifier.28

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 1

    AHRQ-Defined Vulnerable Populations and Selected Studies Demonstrating Disparities in Diabetes Care

    Anderson-Loftin et al.30 evaluated the effect of an educational intervention among a small cohort of rural African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Their dietary intervention incorporated culturally tailored educational sessions and follow-up by a nurse case manager. Recipients of their intervention demonstrated significant improvement in BMI, with a net weight difference of 3.7 kg at 6 months compared to the control group. There were also significant reductions in dietary fat intake, with nonsignificant trends towards improvement in A1C and lipids.28

    Overall, Peek et al. found that patient-centered educational interventions that used peer support or one-on-one interactions were more likely to yield positive results, and those interventions that were culturally tailored resulted in greater reductions in A1C compared to interventions geared for the general patient population.

    Primary care physicians are known to care for the majority of U.S. patients with diabetes.31,32 They are, therefore, logical targets for advancing efforts to eliminate disparities in diabetes care. But could they also be a source of the problem? A national survey of physicians conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation in 2001 found that physicians were less likely than the general public to believe that disparities in health care occur “somewhat often” in all areas except insurance status.33,34 Even when physicians agree that disparities in care are ubiquitous, they are more likely to attribute the causes to patient factors and less likely to believe these problems exist among their own patients or are related to provider factors such as trust and communication. This has been dubbed the “not me” phenomenon.35-37

    Still, there is growing evidence that even well-meaning providers can be subject to unintentional and unconscious biases that manifest in differential care of patients. Sequist et al.38 examined a cohort of primary care physicians representing 14 ambulatory care centers and caring for nearly 300,000 adult patients with diabetes in eastern Massachusetts. Embedded within their electronic medical record system were components such as physician-directed support tools, capacity for team management, and the ability to generate patient mailings regarding needed health services, such as cholesterol screenings. They sought to determine whether variations in diabetes outcomes by race occurred at the level of individual providers.

    The researchers observed that white patients were significantly more likely to achieve A1C, LDL cholesterol, and blood pressure control than African-American patients. Interestingly, a greater proportion of these differences were explained by within-physician effects (i.e., differences within the same physician's panel) rather than socio-demographic factors, and these differences were not linked to overall provider performance or the number of African-American patients in a given panel. Although not explicitly clear, it is plausible that these observed differences were the result of unconscious racial bias or perhaps differential levels of communication between patients and providers.

    Unconscious biases and stereotyping have been postulated to manifest in the clinical setting as “cognitive shortcuts” that occur during the decision-making process inherent within the patient-provider encounter. These heuristic tools are thought to be more likely to occur in situations in which there is time pressure, fatigue, stress, or the need for multitasking—all hallmarks of the day-to-day environment in busy medical practices.39 Although the majority of physicians are aware of their egalitarian responsibilities as providers of health care, many do in fact unconsciously categorize patients based on stereotypes, and there is evidence to suggest that this behavior can potentially influence both the quality of the encounter and physician behavior (i.e., recommendations, counseling, ordering of tests, and prescribing patterns).40-43

    Several conceptual frameworks have been put forth in the literature as explanations of how physicians may contribute to disparities in health care.40,42 One important element that is potentially remediable is that of communication. Ashton et al.40 have proposed that differential communication between patients and providers is often the result of differing levels of congruence in each member's “explanatory model” of illness. For example, if a patient believes that his diabetes was caused by stress or a traumatic event, he may be less likely to adhere solely to the dietary or medication recommendations of his provider.40,44-47

    Racial and ethnic concordance between patients and providers has been shown to be associated with improved communication as well as increased satisfaction, trust, and perception of the quality of care.48-51 Although diversification of our provider workforce is important, it is impractical to believe that complete racial/ethnic concordance between patients and providers in our health care system is necessary or that it would completely alleviate patient-provider barriers in communication. Interestingly, Street et al.52 reported that physicians who employed greater patient-centered communication skills were able to overcome the barriers of racial/ethnic discordance in terms of patient satisfaction, trust, and intent to adhere. Furthermore, physicians' knowledge of their patients' limited health literacy can aid providers in tailoring their delivery of health information and potentially affect both diabetes management and outcomes.53 Therefore, providers of diabetes care would be prudent to consider and evaluate the quality of the communication that occurs during their clinical interactions, particularly with minority patients and regardless of racial/ethnic concordance.

    All of the interventions geared toward providers of diabetes care in Peek's analysis used reminder systems and provider education, such as practice guidelines, personal feedback, and continuing medical education programs. These studies demonstrated significant improvement in several process measures, such as measurement of microalbumin, foot care, and exercise counseling. Only one study met inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis on reduction in A1C, and this study showed a nonsignificant reduction in A1C of 0.47% using problem-based learning as an intervention. Surprisingly, none of these intervention studies used cultural competency or Spanish-language training.28

    What can providers do for their patients and themselves to aid in the reduction and eventual elimination of disparities in diabetes care? We have seen that patients' underlying health literacy and numeracy levels can be associated with worse diabetes outcomes. Providers should not hesitate to assess these skills in their patients,25,27,54 which can provide useful information and serve as a guide for how to best disseminate information to patients with diabetes. In addition to what is already available through organizations such as the American Diabetes Association, many researchers have developed and validated patient educational materials specifically designed for patients with diabetes and sensitive to the issues of literacy and numeracy.26,54-56 Furthermore, many of these materials are both well-suited to and practical for use in the clinical setting. There are also resources available for providers to learn skills to improve their communication style, particularly with low-literacy patients.23,57-61

    It has been shown that providers often experience uncertainty and apprehension when attempting to care for and respond to the needs of patients with racial/ethnic backgrounds that differ from their own.62 This can potentiate clinical inertia, which has been shown to be more prevalent regarding minority patients.63-66 Providers should be aware of the possibility of clinical inertia, especially with regard to their racial/ethnic minority patients and should, for example, consider adjustments to therapy, such as earlier addition of insulin, when clinically appropriate.65,66

    Improved cultural competency can also serve as a means of addressing the uncertainty often experienced during clinical encounters. Beach et al.67 showed that cross-cultural training can improve provider attitudes, knowledge, and skills, although there has been less evidence to support the positive impact that this has on patient outcomes.67,68 Nonetheless, with time and more rigorous research in this area, we are confident that improvements in the delivery of culturally competent care will prove to be a useful tool in addressing disparities in diabetes care.

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table 2

    Provider Approaches to Addressing Disparities in Diabetes Care

    Providers are encouraged to incorporate these recommendations into their quality improvement projects, which are now requirements of accreditation entities such as the American Board of Family Physicians and the American Board of Internal Medicine. A summary of provider approaches to addressing disparities in diabetes care is provided in Table 2. Finally, providers must continue to lobby collectively for necessary changes in the larger health systems in which they work and which often hinder them in providing and hinder patients in receiving the highest possible quality of care.

    In conclusion, disparities in diabetes care continue despite significant clinical advances in understanding the management of this chronic illness. Providers of diabetes care can play a key role in diminishing these disparities through understanding and addressing patient factors such as health literacy and focusing on improved patient communication and cultural competence. If this is done, the U.S. health care system very well may begin to turn the tide and make important strides toward equitable diabetes care and improved outcomes for all.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    Dr. White is supported by Pfizer's Fellowship in Health Literacy & Clear Health Communication and Meharry Medical College's Clinical Research Education and Career Development Program (NIH NCRR CRECD 1R25RR17577). Dr. Beech is supported by Vanderbilt University's Diabetes Research and Training Center (P60 DK020593). Dr. Miller is supported by a Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH) award (5 K12 HD043483-05).

    Footnotes

    • Richard O. White, MD, is an assistant professor in the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Stephania Miller, PhD, is an assistant professor in the Department of Surgery at Meharry Medical College, in Nashville, Tenn. Bettina M. Beech, DrPH, MPH, is an associate professor in the Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Department of Medicine, Institute of Medicine and Public Health, at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, in Nashville, Tenn.

    • American Diabetes Association(R) Inc., 2009

    REFERENCES

    1. ↵
      1. Nelson A
      : Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. J Natl Med Assoc 94:666-668, 2002
      OpenUrlPubMed
    2. ↵
      Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Education Act; Public Law 106-525, Title I, section 101 (42 USC 287c-31). Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, 22 November 2000
    3. ↵
      1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
      : 2007 National Healthcare Disparities Report. Rockville, Md., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008
    4. ↵
      1. Kelley E,
      2. Moy E,
      3. Stryer D,
      4. Burstin H,
      5. Clancy C
      : The national healthcare quality and disparities reports: an overview. Med Care 43:I3-I8, 2005
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
      : National diabetes fact sheet. Atlanta, Ga., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005, p. 8
    6. ↵
      1. Kung HC,
      2. Hoyert DL,
      3. Xu J,
      4. Murphy SL
      : Deaths: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 56:1-120, 2008
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. American Diabetes Association
      : Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007. Diabetes Care 31:596-615, 2008
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    8. ↵
      1. McGlynn EA,
      2. Asch SM,
      3. Adams J,
      4. Keesey J,
      5. Hicks J,
      6. DeCristofaro A,
      7. Kerr EA
      : The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 348:2635-2645, 2003
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Saaddine JB,
      2. Cadwell B,
      3. Gregg EW,
      4. Engelgau MM,
      5. Vinicor F,
      6. Imperatore G,
      7. Narayan KM
      : Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002. Ann Intern Med 144:465-474, 2006
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. Saydah SH,
      2. Fradkin J,
      3. Cowie CC
      : Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA 291:335-342, 2004
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Vijan S,
      2. Hayward RA
      : Treatment of hypertension in type 2 diabetes mellitus: blood pressure goals, choice of agents, and setting priorities in diabetes care. Ann Intern Med 138:593-602, 2003
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      1. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,
      2. National Center for Health Statistics
      : National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, III, 1988-94. Available online from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/elec_prods/subject/nhanes3.htm. Accessed 5 June 2009
    12. ↵
      1. Ong KL,
      2. Cheung BM,
      3. Wong LY,
      4. Wat NM,
      5. Tan KC,
      6. Lam KS
      : Prevalence, treatment, and control of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. Ann Epidemiol 18:222-229, 2008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    13. ↵
      1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
      : Crossing the Quality Chasm:A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press, 2001
    14. ↵
      1. Chin MH,
      2. Walters AE,
      3. Cook SC,
      4. Huang ES
      : Interventions to reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Med Care Res Rev 64:7S-28S, 2007
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    15. ↵
      1. Nielsen-Bohlman L,
      2. Institute of Medicine Committee on Health Literacy
      : Health Literacy: A Prescription to End Confusion. Washington, D.C., National Academies Press, 2004
    16. ↵
      1. Rothman RL,
      2. Housam R,
      3. Weiss H,
      4. Davis D,
      5. Gregory R,
      6. Gebretsadik T,
      7. Shintani A,
      8. Elasy TA
      : Patient understanding of food labels: the role of literacy and numeracy. Am J Prev Med 31:391-398, 2006
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    17. ↵
      1. Kutner MA,
      2. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics
      : The Health Literacy of America's Adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2006
    18. ↵
      1. Montori VM,
      2. Rothman RL
      : Weakness in numbers: the challenge of numeracy in health care. J Gen Intern Med 20:1071-1072, 2005
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Rothman R,
      2. Malone R,
      3. Bryant B,
      4. Dewalt D,
      5. Pignone M
      : Health literacy and diabetic control. JAMA 288:2687-2688, 2002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Schillinger D,
      2. Grumbach K,
      3. Piette J,
      4. Wang F,
      5. Osmond D,
      6. Daher C,
      7. Palacios J,
      8. Sullivan GD,
      9. Bindman AB
      : Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA 288:475-482, 2002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. Cavanaugh K,
      2. Huizinga MM,
      3. Wallston KA,
      4. Gebretsadik T,
      5. Shintani A,
      6. Davis D,
      7. Gregory RP,
      8. Fuchs L,
      9. Malone R,
      10. Cherrington A,
      11. Pignone M,
      12. DeWalt DA,
      13. Elasy TA,
      14. Rothman RL
      : Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med 148:737-746, 2008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      1. Rothman RL,
      2. DeWalt DA,
      3. Malone R,
      4. Bryant B,
      5. Shintani A,
      6. Crigler B,
      7. Weinberger M,
      8. Pignone M
      : Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care-based diabetes disease management program. JAMA 292:1711-1716, 2004
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Wallston KA,
      2. Rothman RL,
      3. Cherrington A
      : Psychometric properties of the Perceived Diabetes Self-Management Scale (PDSMS). J Behav Med 30:395-401, 2007
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Weiss BD,
      2. Mays MZ,
      3. Martz W,
      4. Castro KM,
      5. DeWalt DA,
      6. Pignone MP,
      7. Mockbee J,
      8. Hale FA
      : Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med 3:514-522, 2005
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    24. ↵
      1. Huizinga MM,
      2. Elasy TA,
      3. Wallston KA,
      4. Cavanaugh K,
      5. Davis D,
      6. Gregory RP,
      7. Fuchs LS,
      8. Malone R,
      9. Cherrington A,
      10. Dewalt DA,
      11. Buse J,
      12. Pignone M,
      13. Rothman RL
      : Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT). BMC Health Serv Res 8:96, 2008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    25. ↵
      1. Ryan JG,
      2. Leguen F,
      3. Weiss BD,
      4. Albury S,
      5. Jennings T,
      6. Velez F,
      7. Salibi N
      : Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice? Health Educ Res 23:603-611, 2008
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Peek ME,
      2. Cargill A,
      3. Huang ES
      : Diabetes health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions. Med Care Res Rev 64:101S-156S, 2007
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Piette JD,
      2. Weinberger M,
      3. McPhee SJ,
      4. Mah CA,
      5. Kraemer FB,
      6. Crapo LM
      : Do automated calls with nurse follow-up improve self-care and glycemic control among vulnerable patients with diabetes? Am J Med 108:20-27, 2000
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Anderson-Loftin W,
      2. Barnett S,
      3. Bunn P,
      4. Sullivan P,
      5. Hussey J,
      6. Tavakoli A
      : Soul food light: culturally competent diabetes education. Diabetes Educ 31:555-563, 2005
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Middleton K,
      2. Hing E
      : National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2003 outpatient department summary. Adv Data 366:1-36, 2005
      OpenUrlPubMed
    30. ↵
      1. Hing E,
      2. Cherry DK,
      3. Woodwell DA
      : National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 summary. Adv Data 374:1-33, 2006
      OpenUrlPubMed
    31. ↵
      1. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
      : Race, Ethnicity & Medical Care: A Survey of Public Perceptions and Experiences. Menlo Park, Calif., Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 1999
    32. ↵
      1. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
      : National Survey of Physicians. Part 1, Doctors on Disparities in Medical Care: Highlights and Chartpack. Menlo Park, Calif., Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2002
    33. ↵
      1. Sequist TD,
      2. Ayanian JZ,
      3. Marshall R,
      4. Fitzmaurice GM,
      5. Safran DG
      : Primary-care clinician perceptions of racial disparities in diabetes care. J Gen Intern Med 23:678-684, 2008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Ayanian JZ,
      2. Cleary PD,
      3. Keogh JH,
      4. Noonan SJ,
      5. David-Kasdan JA,
      6. Epstein AM
      : Physicians' beliefs about racial differences in referral for renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 43:350-357, 2004
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Lurie N,
      2. Fremont A,
      3. Jain AK,
      4. Taylor SL,
      5. McLaughlin R,
      6. Peterson E,
      7. Kong BW,
      8. Ferguson TB, Jr
      : Racial and ethnic disparities in care: the perspectives of cardiologists. Circulation 111:1264-1269, 2005
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    35. ↵
      1. Sequist TD,
      2. Fitzmaurice GM,
      3. Marshall R,
      4. Shaykevich S,
      5. Safran DG,
      6. Ayanian JZ
      : Physician performance and racial disparities in diabetes mellitus care. Arch Intern Med 168:1145-1151, 2008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Aberegg SK,
      2. Terry PB
      : Medical decision-making and healthcare disparities: the physician's role. J Lab Clin Med 144:11-17, 2004
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Ashton CM,
      2. Haidet P,
      3. Paterniti DA,
      4. Collins TC,
      5. Gordon HS,
      6. O'Malley K,
      7. Petersen LA,
      8. Sharf BF,
      9. Suarez-Almazor ME,
      10. Wray NP,
      11. Street RL, Jr
      : Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of health services: bias, preferences, or poor communication? J Gen Intern Med 18:146-152, 2003
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Schulman KA,
      2. Berlin JA,
      3. Harless W,
      4. Kerner JF,
      5. Sistrunk S,
      6. Gersh BJ,
      7. Dube R,
      8. Taleghani CK,
      9. Burke JE,
      10. Williams S,
      11. Eisenberg JM,
      12. Escarce JJ
      : The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med 340:618-626, 1999
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    38. ↵
      1. van Ryn M
      : Research on the provider contribution to race/ethnicity disparities in medical care. Med Care 40:140-151, 2002
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    39. ↵
      1. Burgess DJ,
      2. Fu SS,
      3. van Ryn M
      : Why do providers contribute to disparities and what can be done about it? J Gen Intern Med 19:1154-1159, 2004
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    40. ↵
      1. Sullivan LV,
      2. Hicks P,
      3. Salazar G,
      4. Robinson CK
      : Patient beliefs and sense of control among Spanish-speaking patients with diabetes in Northeast Colorado. J Immigr Minor Health [Published online ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s10903-008-9184-9
      1. Jezewski MA,
      2. Poss J
      : Mexican Americans' explanatory model of type 2 diabetes. West J Nurs Res 24:840-858; discussion 858-867, 2002
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Hatcher E,
      2. Whittemore R
      : Hispanic adults' beliefs about type 2 diabetes: clinical implications. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 19:536-545, 2007
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    41. ↵
      1. Caban A,
      2. Walker EA
      : A systematic review of research on culturally relevant issues for Hispanics with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 32:584-595, 2006
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    42. ↵
      1. Cooper LA,
      2. Roter DL,
      3. Johnson RL,
      4. Ford DE,
      5. Steinwachs DM,
      6. Powe NR
      : Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med 139:907-915, 2003
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Stepanikova I
      : Patient-physician racial and ethnic concordance and perceived medical errors. Soc Sci Med 63:3060-3066, 2006
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Saha S,
      2. Komaromy M,
      3. Koepsell TD,
      4. Bindman AB
      : Patient-physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med 159:997-1004, 1999
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    43. ↵
      1. Laveist TA,
      2. Nuru-Jeter A
      : Is doctor-patient race concordance associated with greater satisfaction with care? J Health Soc Behav 43:296-306, 2002
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    44. ↵
      1. Street RL, Jr,
      2. O'Malley KJ,
      3. Cooper LA,
      4. Haidet P
      : Understanding concordance in patient-physician relationships: personal and ethnic dimensions of shared identity. Ann Fam Med 6:198-205, 2008
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    45. ↵
      1. Seligman HK,
      2. Wang FF,
      3. Palacios JL,
      4. Wilson CC,
      5. Daher C,
      6. Piette JD,
      7. Schillinger D
      : Physician notification of their diabetes patients' limited health literacy: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 20:1001-1007, 2005
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    46. ↵
      1. Rothman RL,
      2. Malone R,
      3. Bryant B,
      4. Wolfe C,
      5. Padgett P,
      6. DeWalt DA,
      7. Weinberger M,
      8. Pignone M
      : The Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes scale: a diabetes knowledge scale for vulnerable patients. Diabetes Educ 31:215-224, 2005
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Wallace AS,
      2. Seligman HK,
      3. Davis TC,
      4. Schillinger D,
      5. Arnold CL,
      6. Bryant-Shilliday B,
      7. Freburger JK,
      8. Dewalt DA
      : Literacy-appropriate educational materials and brief counseling improve diabetes self-management. Patient Educ Couns 75:328-333, 2009
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    47. ↵
      1. Seligman HK,
      2. Wallace AS,
      3. DeWalt DA,
      4. Schillinger D,
      5. Arnold CL,
      6. Shilliday BB,
      7. Delgadillo A,
      8. Bengal N,
      9. Davis TC
      : Facilitating behavior change with low-literacy patient education materials. Am J Health Behav 31 (Suppl. 1):S69-S78, 2007
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    48. ↵
      1. Dewalt DA,
      2. Davis TC,
      3. Wallace AS,
      4. Seligman HK,
      5. Bryant-Shilliday B,
      6. Arnold CL,
      7. Freburger J,
      8. Schillinger D
      : Goal setting in diabetes self-management: taking the baby steps to success. Patient Educ Couns. In press. Corrected proof available online from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6TBC-4W1BFM9-8-1&_cdi=5139&_user=4147898&_orig=search&_coverDate=04%2F08%2F2009&_sk=999999999&view=c&wchp=dGLbVtz-zSkWA&md5=abad48ac95e06710071a32d327a32ca8&ie=/sdarticle.pdf
      1. Lorenzen B,
      2. Melby CE,
      3. Earles B
      : Using principles of health literacy to enhance the informed consent process. AORN J 88:23-29, 2008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Wilson FL,
      2. Baker LM,
      3. Nordstrom CK,
      4. Legwand C
      : Using the teach-back and Orem's Self-care Deficit Nursing theory to increase childhood immunization communication among low-income mothers. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 31:7-22, 2008
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
      1. Doak CC,
      2. Doak LG,
      3. Friedell GH,
      4. Meade CD
      : Improving comprehension for cancer patients with low literacy skills: strategies for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin 48:151-162, 1998
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    49. ↵
      1. Schillinger D,
      2. Piette J,
      3. Grumbach K,
      4. Wang F,
      5. Wilson C,
      6. Daher C,
      7. Leong-Grotz K,
      8. Castro C,
      9. Bindman AB
      : Closing the loop: physician communication with diabetic patients who have low health literacy. Arch Intern Med 163:83-90, 2003
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    50. ↵
      1. Kai J,
      2. Beavan J,
      3. Faull C,
      4. Dodson L,
      5. Gill P,
      6. Beighton A
      : Professional uncertainty and disempowerment responding to ethnic diversity in health care: a qualitative study. PLoS Med 4:e323(1766-1775), 2007
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    51. ↵
      1. Ziemer DC,
      2. Miller CD,
      3. Rhee MK,
      4. Doyle JP,
      5. Watkins C, Jr,
      6. Cook CB,
      7. Gallina DL,
      8. El-Kebbi IM,
      9. Barnes CS,
      10. Dunbar VG,
      11. Branch WT, Jr,
      12. Phillips LS
      : Clinical inertia contributes to poor diabetes control in a primary care setting. Diabetes Educ 31:564-571, 2005
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Appel SJ,
      2. Giger JN
      : The nurse's role in discouraging clinical inertia in diabetes management: optimizing cardiovascular health among African-Americans. J Natl Black Nurses Assoc 18:vii-viii, 2007
      OpenUrl
    52. ↵
      1. McEwen LN,
      2. Bilik D,
      3. Johnson SL,
      4. Halter JB,
      5. Karter AJ,
      6. Mangione CM,
      7. Subramanian U,
      8. Waitzfelder B,
      9. Crosson JC,
      10. Herman WH
      : The predictors and impact of intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy in type 2 diabetes: Translating Research into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD). Diabetes Care 32:971-976, 2009
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    53. ↵
      1. Hsu WC
      : Consequences of delaying progression to optimal therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycemic goals. South Med J 102:67-76, 2009
      OpenUrlPubMed
    54. ↵
      1. Beach MC,
      2. Price EG,
      3. Gary TL,
      4. Robinson KA,
      5. Gozu A,
      6. Palacio A,
      7. Smarth C,
      8. Jenckes MW,
      9. Feuerstein C,
      10. Bass EB,
      11. Powe NR,
      12. Cooper LA
      : Cultural competence: a systematic review of health care provider educational interventions. Med Care 43:356-373, 2005
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    55. ↵
      1. Thom DH,
      2. Tirado MD,
      3. Woon TL,
      4. McBride MR
      : Development and evaluation of a cultural competency training curriculum. BMC Med Educ 6:38, 2006
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    View Abstract
    PreviousNext
    Back to top

    In this Issue

    July 2009, 27(3)
    • Table of Contents
    • Index by Author
    Sign up to receive current issue alerts
    View Selected Citations (0)
    Print
    Download PDF
    Article Alerts
    Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
    Email Article

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Clinical Diabetes.

    NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Health Care Disparities and Diabetes Care: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Providers
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Diabetes
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Clinical Diabetes web site.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Citation Tools
    Health Care Disparities and Diabetes Care: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Providers
    Richard O. White, Bettina M. Beech, Stephania Miller
    Clinical Diabetes Jul 2009, 27 (3) 105-112; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.27.3.105

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    Add to Selected Citations
    Share

    Health Care Disparities and Diabetes Care: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Providers
    Richard O. White, Bettina M. Beech, Stephania Miller
    Clinical Diabetes Jul 2009, 27 (3) 105-112; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.27.3.105
    del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Jump to section

    • Article
      • IN BRIEF
      • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
      • Footnotes
      • REFERENCES
    • Figures & Tables
    • Info & Metrics
    • PDF

    Related Articles

    Cited By...

    More in this TOC Section

    • Opportunities and Challenges for Biosimilars: What's on the Horizon in the Global Insulin Market?
    • The Role of the Kidney and Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibition in Diabetes Management
    • Tests for Screening and Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
    Show more Features

    Similar Articles

    Navigate

    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Abridged Standards of Care
    • Archives
    • Submit
    • Subscribe
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds

    More Information

    • About the Journal
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Reprints and Permissions
    • Advertising
    • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
    • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
    • Contact Us

    Other ADA Resources

    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
    • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
    • Professional Books
    • Diabetes Forecast

     

    • DiabetesJournals.org
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • ADA's DiabetesPro
    • ADA Member Directory
    • Diabetes.org

    © 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Clinical Diabetes Print ISSN: 0891-8929, Online ISSN: 1945-4953.