Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Clinical Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • Clinical Compendia
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • Clinical Compendia
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
Feature Articles

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Diabetes: A Clinical Review

  1. Gurjeet S. Birdee, MD, MPH and
  2. Gloria Yeh, MD, MPH
Clinical Diabetes 2010 Oct; 28(4): 147-155. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.28.4.147
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) refers to a wide range of clinical therapies outside of conventional medicine.1 The term “complementary” refers to therapies that are used in conjunction with conventional medicine, whereas “alternative” medicine includes therapies that are used in place of conventional medicine. The term “integrative” medicine has been advocated by some CAM providers and researchers as representing a combination of conventional medicine, CAM, and evidence-based medicine.2

The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, a federal scientific agency for CAM research, categorizes CAM into five domains: biologically based practices, mind-body medicine, manipulation and body-based practices, energy medicine, and whole-medical systems (Table 1). Biologically based practices and mind-body medicine are the most common CAM modalities used and studied for the treatment of diabetes in the West and are the focus of this review.

In the United States, CAM is frequently used by adults, with 40% reporting use in the past 12 months.3 An estimated 34% of adults with diabetes use some type of CAM therapy.4 The estimated out-of-pocket expense in 2007 on CAM therapies was $44 billion.5

Although some CAM therapies have been shown to affect glycemic control, the clinical efficacy and mechanism of many CAM therapies for diabetes is controversial, and safety issues are a concern. Adverse effects of many CAM therapies are not well documented. Because patients with diabetes often take multiple prescription medications, there exists the potential for herb-drug and herb-dietary supplement interactions, leading to adverse events.6,7 At least 63% of the general population do not disclose use of CAM therapies to their physicians.8

The purpose of this clinical review is to discuss selected CAM therapies frequently used for patients with diabetes and to provide a framework to advise patients on CAM use.

Biologically Based Practices: Herbs and Supplements

INBRIEF

More than one-third of patients with diabetes in the United States use some type of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Herbs, dietary supplements, and mind-body medicine are the most commonly used and studied CAM modalities to treat diabetes. This article provides an overview of CAM for diabetes, including proposed mechanisms, a summary of evidence, and adverse effects. It also offers recommendations for counseling patients regarding CAM use.

Definition, regulation, and safety

In 1994, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), approved by the U.S. Congress, defined dietary supplements as products taken by mouth that contain vitamins, minerals, herbs, or other botanicals, amino acids, and substances such as enzymes, organ tissues, glandular substances, and metabolites. Supplements can take different forms, including tablets, capsules, soft gels, gel capsules, liquids, or powders.

Importantly, DSHEA treats dietary supplements as a type of food rather than as drugs. Under this bill, dietary supplements do not need U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval before marketing, and manufacturers are not mandated to establish the quality, efficacy, or safety of products. Manufacturers cannot make specific clinical claims that supplements can treat or cure a specific condition. However, nonspecific statements are allowed, such as proclamations that the product “supports,” “promotes,” or “enhances” specific organ systems. For example, a supplement manufacturer cannot state on the product label that the substance “reduces blood glucose in patients with diabetes,” but may state that the product “supports glucose tolerance.”

After marketing, the FDA is responsible for determining whether dietary supplements are “unsafe.” In 2007, the FDA established a new set of regulations called Good Manufacturing Practices to improve the quality of dietary supplements by requiring the industry to appropriately label and ensure the purity, strength, and composition of all dietary supplements. These regulations are scheduled to be phased in by this year. Therefore, their successful implementation cannot yet be evaluated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 1.

Types of Complementary and Alternative Medicine1

The high consumer demand, large supplement industry, and current regulatory framework yield a wide range of products with different compositions and uncertain safety and efficacy. In a 2008 position statement, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) stated that there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate the efficacy of supplements in diabetes management and recognized the lack of standardization among preparations.9 In the following discussion, we summarize selected herbs and dietary supplements that are commonly used for patients with diabetes and that clinicians may encounter in practice (Table 2).

Botanical products for diabetes treatment

Allium sativum (garlic). Found in many kitchens, allium sativum (garlic), has also been used for medicinal purposes around the world. A majority of contemporary medical use and research for garlic has focused on treatment of cardiovascular-related diseases.

In clinical trials, garlic supplementation among patients with dyslipidemia produced modest reduction in total cholesterol with no significant changes in LDL or HDL cholesterol levels.10,11 Pooled data from clinical trials of patients with hypertension have shown significant decreases in systolic (8.4 ± 2.8mmHg) and diastolic (7.3 ± 1.5mmHg) blood pressure levels in patients using garlic treatment compared to control groups.12 Less research has been conducted among patients with diabetes. Limited animal studies have suggested that the chemical components of garlic may increase insulin secretion or decrease degradation.10,11 Clinical trials of oral garlic in patients with type 2 diabetes have not demonstrated significant changes in blood glucose or insulin levels.12,13

Aloe vera. This desert plant is the source of the common gel used topically for dermatological conditions. In the Arabian peninsula, parts of the aloe plant have been used orally as a traditional treatment for diabetes. The gel derived from the meaty pulp of the leaf, taken orally, may produce hypoglycemic effects through β-cell stimulation.13,14

Two controlled, nonrandomized trials in patients with type 2 diabetes who were given aloe gel juice reported decreases in fasting blood glucose during 6 weeks.15,16 However, these studies lacked sufficient details in reporting, including study design and results, leading to inconclusive evidence. In contrast to the gel, aloe latex from the inner lining of the leaf contains a harsh anthroquinone laxative that may be unsafe.17

Coccinia indica (ivy gourd). Ayurveda is a traditional medical system from the Indian subcontinent that often uses herbs for treatment. The creeper plant coccinia indica is prescribed in Ayurveda for the treatment of diabetes. Coccinia may produce hypoglycemia in a mechanism similar to insulin.18 Two randomized, controlled trials (RCTs)19,20 and one controlled, nonrandomized trial18 have suggested decreases in fasting blood glucose without adverse effects among type 2 diabetes patients after administration of coccinia. In one of these studies,20 60 subjects were randomized to coccinia or placebo. Patients who received the herb had a 16% decrease in fasting blood glucose.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

Selected Biologically Based Practices Used for Diabetes

Although data are suggestive of a therapeutic effect for coccinia, further research is necessary to determine optimal preparations, dose, mechanisms, and safety.

Gymnema sylvestre (gymnema). This botanical has also been used for two centuries in Ayurveda for the treatment of diabetes. Traditionally, the leaves of the plant are chewed, which can suppress the sweet taste sensation, giving rise to its Hindi name gurmar, or “sugar destroyer.” In addition to affecting taste, the herb has demonstrated hypoglycemic effects in animal and human studies, perhaps functioning as an insulin secretagogue.21,22

An extract of gymnema leaf, called GS4, has been studied as an adjuvant therapy to conventional care in two controlled, nonrandomized trials of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively.23,24 Both studies reported significant before-to-after improvements in fasting blood glucose and A1C levels among patients receiving GS4. No significant before-to-after changes were reported in the control groups. These studies lacked between-group comparisons and randomization, precluding definitive evidence for gymnema for the treatment of diabetes.

Momordica charantia (bitter melon). This tropical vegetable, grown in Africa, Asia, and South America, is known as bitter melon, or “vegetable insulin.” It may reduce blood glucose in patients with diabetes.25,26 Potential mechanisms of action for bitter melon are decreased hepatic glucose production, increased hepatic glycogen synthesis,27 and insulin-mimetic activity.28,29 Most clinical trials of bitter melon among patients with diabetes have lacked adequate design to determine clinical effectiveness.26,30

Opuntia streptacantha (prickly pear cactus, nopal). Found in desert regions of North America, nopal is used in Mexican cuisine and indigenous medicine. Mexican-American patients with diabetes have reported using nopal for glucose control.31 Few studies of nopal have been published in English, and these have explored acute metabolic effects rather than clinical outcomes.32,33

Panex ginseng, P. quiquefolius (ginseng). The panex genus contains multiple species described as ginseng, with two varieties most frequently used and studied: panex ginseng (Asian ginseng, Chinese ginseng, Korean ginseng) and panex quinquefolius (American ginseng). The root of this herb traditionally has been used in Asia and is one of the most popular botanicals in the United States.3

Ginseng has many proposed health benefits, including improved general well-being, increased concentration, and treatment of cardiovascular disease and diabetes (panex is cognate to panacea). Ginseng can cause hypoglycemia, perhaps through activity similar to insulin or by altering hepatic glucose metabolism.34

Buettner et al., in a systematic review,35 found conflicting clinical data of ginseng's effect on blood glucose in diabetic and nondiabetic populations. Variations in response may reflect chemical heterogeneity of different ginseng batches used in studies.36,37

Trigonella foenum graecum (fenugreek). Fenugreek is grown in North America and Asia and often flavors Indian food. It has been used as medicine for diabetes in India and China. Mechanisms proposed for fenugreek in diabetes are decreased carbohydrate absorption and increased insulin secretion.

Several clinical trials among patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes suggest a potential effect, but studies thus far have lacked sufficient quality.38,39

Dietary supplements for diabetes

Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA). ALA is a chemical compound that is found in food (especially high in spinach, broccoli, and tomatoes), produced endogenously, and sold as a nutritional supplement. As an antioxidant, ALA may mitigate high levels of oxidative stress, which in patients with diabetes contributes to insulin resistance and secondary complications such as diabetic neuropathy.40

Acute intravenous ALA therapy (1–10 days) has been reported to improve insulin sensitivity.41,42 A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of ALA supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes43 showed a 25% increase in insulin sensitivity after 4 weeks of ALA therapy at doses of 600–1,800 mg. The long-term effects of ALA have yet to be determined, although one study of patients with type 2 diabetes showed improved glycemic control after 12 weeks of therapy.44

Chromium. As an essential mineral, chromium plays an important role in facilitating glucose metabolism. Whole grains, egg yolks, broccoli, and brewer's yeast have high quantities of chromium.45 Although rare, severe states of chromium deficiency are associated with reversible diabetes because of insulin resistance.46,47 These observations have fueled marketing of chromium for individuals with diabetes who are not necessarily deficient in chromium to increase insulin sensitivity.

A meta-analysis of 14 RCTs48 of patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 381) concluded that there were significant changes in glucose metabolism after supplementation with chromium. Overall, the authors emphasized the poor quality of studies and the need for further research. Reports suggest that response to chromium may be dependent on individual patient phenotypes with those with high insulin resistance being most responsive.49–51

Coenzyme Q10. Coenzyme Q10 is a cofactor used in oxidative respiration and is produced endogenously. Supplementation of coenzyme Q10 is especially popular for cardiovascular diseases. Two RCTs of patients with type 2 diabetes and a single RCT of patients with type 1 diabetes produced no strong evidence for glycemic control with coenzyme Q10 supplementation.52,53

Magnesium. Magnesium is an abundant mineral in the human body involved in numerous biochemical processes, including glucose metabolism. Dietary sources of magnesium include whole grains, beans, nuts, and green, leafy vegetables. Magnesium deficiency is associated with poor glucose control in patients with diabetes.54 However, in clinical trials, supplementation of magnesium has not yielded clear long-term positive benefits in type 2 diabetes.

Song et al.55 conducted a meta-analysis compiling data from nine RCTs with a total of 370 subjects with type 2 diabetes. The duration of the studies ranged from 4 to 16 weeks and the studies administered a median magnesium dose of 15 mmol/day (360 mg/day) to active-treatment groups. The mean post-intervention fasting glucose after 12 weeks of treatment was significantly lower among active-treatment compared to placebo groups: –0.56 mmol/l (95% CI –1.10 to –0.01). The difference in post-intervention A1C was not significant.

Observational data suggest that magnesium supplementation may decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes. A meta-analysis in 200756 included seven prospective cohort studies that collected dietary and supplementary magnesium intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes. The relative risk for the development of type 2 diabetes with a 100 mg/day increase in magnesium was 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.92).

Omega-3 fatty acid. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are one of the most common dietary supplements taken in the United States.3 Major sources of omega-3 PUFAs include fish, marine-derived supplements, and prescription formulations (sold under the trade names Omacor and Lovaza).

In the general population, observational studies and RCTs indicate reductions in coronary artery disease and sudden cardiac death based on omega-3 PUFA intake.57,58 In patients with type 2 diabetes, a meta-analysis of omega-3 PUFA supplementation59 that pooled data from 23 RCTs with a total of 1,075 patients did not show any significant changes in fasting glucose, A1C, or fasting insulin.

With a mean intake of 3.5 g/day of omega-3 PUFAs, significant decreases in triglycerides (–0.45 mmol/l, 95% CI –0.58 to –0.32) and VLDL cholesterol (–0.07 mmol/l, 95% CI –0.13 to 0.00) and increases in LDL cholesterol (0.11 mmol/l, 95% CI 0.00–0.22) were noted. Subanalysis of patients with hypertriglyceridemia demonstrated no significant increase in LDL. Based on multiple studies, high omega-3 PUFA intake does not prevent the onset of type 2 diabetes.60

Vanadium. Vanadium is a mineral with no known biological importance or deficiency-associated disease.39,61 Although three controlled studies of vanadium for type 2 diabetes reported significant decreases in fasting blood glucose levels, small sample sizes and lack of randomization limit these results.62–64

Mind-Body Medicine

Mind-body medicine is based on the concept that the physical body and mind influence each other. It uses specific techniques to affect this connection for the benefit of health. Mind-body techniques have arisen in various cultures and contexts. Some mind-body techniques, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, bio-feedback, and hypnosis, have been adapted into mainstream medical culture and usually are not considered CAM.

Within CAM, most mind-body therapies have derived from Eastern traditions, such as yoga, tai chi, and meditation. Yoga, a mind-body practice from India, has become increasingly popular in the West to promote health. The practice of yoga may include techniques of movement, breathing, meditation, chanting, and lifestyle change. Tai chi is a mind-body practice from China with roots in martial arts and ancient healing traditions. Tai chi consists of coordinated gentle movements with mental focus, breathing, and relaxation.65 Meditation consists of various techniques that regulate the mind to produce a desired mental state. Examples of meditative techniques are mantra-based meditation, relaxation response, mindfulness meditation, Transcendental Meditation, Vipassana meditation, and Zen meditation.

For therapies that include movement, such as yoga and tai chi, mind-body therapies can be a form of exercise for patients with diabetes. According to ADA, patients with diabetes should be advised to perform at least 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity aerobic physical activity.66 The exercise intensity of yoga and tai chi has been categorized as low- to moderate-intensity.67–70 However, in controlled clinical trials, neither yoga71,72 nor tai chi73–77 has consistently demonstrated significant long-term improvements in glycemic control or A1C.

Chronic diseases such as diabetes are associated with diminished quality of life and psychological depression and anxiety. Mind-body therapies have behavioral and psychological effects that may help patients cope with disease and improve mood and quality of life.78 Among patients with diabetes, clinical trials have shown improvement in measures of quality of life and stress with yoga and tai chi practice.73,79–81 Very few studies of meditation have been conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes.78,82

The risks of practicing mind-body medicine are minimal, and movement-based practices such as tai chi and yoga probably have equivalent risk to conventional exercise. Overall, the quality of published research for mind-body interventions for patients with diabetes is poor, and more rigorous study is necessary.

Advising Patients With Diabetes About CAM Therapies

Health care providers treating patients with diabetes should ask patients about their use of CAM therapies. Given the low disclosure of CAM use by patients to physicians, clinicians need to actively inquire about such therapies.

When collecting information about medications in a patient history, clinicians should also ask about the use of herbs and dietary supplements. Mind-body practices can be reviewed in the context of social history when evaluating physical activity and assessing strategies to deal with stress.

Because patients often self-select CAM modalities, providers should ask patients why they chose a particular therapy. This will help providers understand patients' knowledge and beliefs about the therapy and foster communication between providers and patients.

After identifying CAM use, physicians can access resources to evaluate further clinical efficacy and safety. Table 3 outlines both public and proprietary resources for clinicians and patients. Checking resources for potential interactions with chronic medications is important to avoid adverse effects. Dietary supplements reviewed in Table 1 may augment the effect of conventional glucose-lowering medications, producing hypoglycemia.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 3.

Resources for Information on CAM

In advising patients on CAM use for diabetes, physicians need to weigh the evidence of efficacy and safety (Table 4).83 For CAM modalities that are clearly ineffective and may be unsafe, discouraging patients is most appropriate. In contrast, when there is convincing information for efficacy and safety, providers may recommend use. Many CAM therapies for diabetes have inconclusive data on efficacy but are probably safe. In such cases, patient counseling and monitored use is reasonable.

Patients taking herbs or supplements concurrent with medications may require more frequent evaluation to identify potential interactions. Providers can also highlight the cost of CAM therapies to patients, especially when efficacy is doubtful. Because of limited data, women who are pregnant or lactating and children should be cautioned about the unknown potential adverse effects of dietary supplements.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 4.

Advising Patients on CAM Use

When patients choose to take a botanical or dietary supplement, providers may be asked to recommend specific products. Given the manufacturing and regulatory framework, there is high variability in the content and quality of products sold. Consumers may use a third-party resource such as Consumer Labs (www.ConsumberLabs.com) to identify dietary supplements with higher integrity. Another option is to use formulations already shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of patients with diabetes use CAM therapies, and health care providers need to be prepared to counsel such patients. Frequently, CAM modalities used for diabetes are biologically based therapies and mind-body medicine. Biologically based practices, including herbs and dietary supplements, can affect glucose metabolism, but evidence for their clinical use in patients with diabetes is scarce. Mind-body practices may offer a healthy lifestyle change for patients with diabetes, but long-term improvements in glycemic control have not been shown in clinical trials.

Regulation of botanical products in the United States allows for marketing without established efficacy or safety. Physicians need to specifically ask about supplement use and monitor patients for potential adverse effects, especially hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes.

When counseling patients on CAM use, physicians should respect patients' choices regarding self-management, while providing evidence-based information about efficacy and safety or the lack thereof. Despite unclear data, a large number of patients will continue using CAM in the future. As research grows in this field, physicians have an opportunity to help patients make decisions about the most safe and effective CAM therapies to consider.

Footnotes

  • Gurjeet S. Birdee, MD, MPH, is an assistant professor in the Division of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics and Vanderbilt Center for Integrative Health at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tenn. Gloria Yeh, MD, MPH, is an associate professor in the Division for Research and Education in Complementary and Integrative Medical Therapies at the Osher Research Center and in the Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center of Harvard Medical School in Boston, Mass.

  • American Diabetes Association(R) Inc., 2010

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health: What is CAM? [article online] Available from http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam/overview.htm. Accessed 24 May 2010
  2. ↵
    1. Snyderman R,
    2. Weil AT
    : Integrative medicine: bringing medicine back to its roots. Arch Intern Med 162:395–397, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    1. Barnes PM,
    2. Bloom B,
    3. Nahin RL
    : Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Rep 12:1–23, 2009
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bell RA,
    2. Suerken CK,
    3. Grzywacz JG,
    4. Lang W,
    5. Quandt SA,
    6. Arcury TA
    : Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults with diabetes in the United States. Altern Ther Health Med 12:16–22, 2006
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Nahin RL,
    2. Barnes PM,
    3. Stussman BJ,
    4. Bloom B
    : Costs of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and frequency of visits to CAM practitioners: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Rep 18:1–14, 2009
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Kennedy DA,
    2. Seely D
    : Clinically based evidence of drug-herb interactions: a systematic review. Expert Opin Drug Saf 9:79–124, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    1. Gardiner P,
    2. Graham RE,
    3. Legedza AT,
    4. Eisenberg DM,
    5. Phillips RS
    : Factors associated with dietary supplement use among prescription medication users. Arch Intern Med 166:1968–1974, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    1. Eisenberg DM,
    2. Kessler RC,
    3. Van Rompay MI,
    4. Kaptchuk TJ,
    5. Wilkey SA,
    6. Appel S,
    7. Davis RB
    : Perceptions about complementary therapies relative to conventional therapies among adults who use both: results from a national survey. Ann Intern Med 135:344–351, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. ↵
    1. Bantle JP,
    2. Wylie-Rosett J,
    3. Albright AL,
    4. Apovian CM,
    5. Clark NG,
    6. Franz MJ,
    7. Hoogwerf BJ,
    8. Lichtenstein AH,
    9. Mayer-Davis E,
    10. Mooradian AD,
    11. Wheeler ML
    : Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 31 (Suppl. 1):S61–S78, 2008
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Reinhart KM,
    2. Talati R,
    3. White CM,
    4. Coleman CI
    : The impact of garlic on lipid parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Res Rev 22:39–48, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Stevinson C,
    2. Pittler MH,
    3. Ernst E
    : Garlic for treating hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 133:420–429, 2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Ried K,
    2. Frank OR,
    3. Stocks NP,
    4. Fakler P,
    5. Sullivan T
    : Effect of garlic on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 8:13, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ajabnoor MA
    : Effect of aloes on blood glucose levels in normal and alloxan diabetic mice. J Ethnopharmacol 28:215–220, 1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Ghannam N,
    2. Kingston M,
    3. Al-Meshaal IA,
    4. Tariq M,
    5. Parman NS,
    6. Woodhouse N
    : The antidiabetic activity of aloes: preliminary clinical and experimental observations. Horm Res 24:288–294, 1986
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    1. Bunyapraphatsara N,
    2. Yongchaiyudha S,
    3. Rungpitarangsi V,
    4. Chokechaijaroenporn O
    : Antidiabetic activity of aloe vera L. juice. II. Clinical trial in diabetes mellitus patients in combination with glibenclamide. Phytomed 3:245–248, 1996
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Yongchaiyudha S,
    2. Rungpitarangsi V,
    3. Bunyapraphatsara N,
    4. Chokechaijaroenporn O
    : Antidiabetic activity of aloe vera L. juice. I. Clinical trial in new cases of diabetes mellitus. Phytomed 3:241–243, 1996
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Siegers CP,
    2. von Hertzberg-Lottin E,
    3. Otte M,
    4. Schneider B
    : Anthranoid laxative abuse: a risk for colorectal cancer? Gut 34:1099–1101, 1993
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Kamble SM,
    2. Kamlakar PL,
    3. Vaidya S,
    4. Bambole VD
    : Influence of Coccinia indica on certain enzymes in glycolytic and lipolytic pathway in human diabetes. Indian J Med Sci 52:143–146, 1998
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Azad Khan AK,
    2. Akhtar S,
    3. Mahtab H
    : Coccinia indica in the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 5:60–66, 1979
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kuriyan R,
    2. Rajendran R,
    3. Bantwal G,
    4. Kurpad AV
    : Effect of supplementation of Coccinia cordifolia extract on newly detected diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 31:216–220, 2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Preuss HG,
    2. Jarrell ST,
    3. Scheckenbach R,
    4. Lieberman S,
    5. Anderson RA
    : Comparative effects of chromium, vanadium and gymnema sylvestre on sugar-induced blood pressure elevations in SHR. J Am Coll Nutr 17:116–123, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Shanmugasundaram ER,
    2. Gopinath KL,
    3. Radha Shanmugasundaram K,
    4. Rajendran VM
    : Possible regeneration of the islets of Langerhans in streptozotocin-diabetic rats given Gymnema sylvestre leaf extracts. J Ethnopharmacol 30:265–279, 1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    1. Shanmugasundaram ER,
    2. Rajeswari G,
    3. Baskaran K,
    4. Rajesh Kumar BR,
    5. Radha Shanmugasundaram K,
    6. Kizar Ahmath B
    : Use of Gymnema sylvestre leaf extract in the control of blood glucose in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Ethnopharmacol 30:281–294, 1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Baskaran K,
    2. Kizar Ahamath B,
    3. Radha Shanmugasundaram K,
    4. Shanmugasundaram ER
    : Antidiabetic effect of a leaf extract from Gymnema sylvestre in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. J Ethnopharmacol 30:295–300, 1990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Krawinkel MB,
    2. Keding GB
    : Bitter gourd (Momordica Charantia): a dietary approach to hyperglycemia. Nutr Rev 64:331–337, 2006
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Leung L,
    2. Birtwhistle R,
    3. Kotecha J,
    4. Hannah S,
    5. Cuthbertson S
    : Anti-diabetic and hypoglycaemic effects of Momordica charantia (bitter melon): a mini review. Br J Nutr 102:1703–1708, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Shibib BA,
    2. Khan LA,
    3. Rahman R
    : Hypoglycaemic activity of Coccinia indica and Momordica charantia in diabetic rats: depression of the hepatic gluconeogenic enzymes glucose-6-phosphatase and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase and elevation of both liver and red-cell shunt enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Biochem J 292:267–270, 1993
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Ng TB,
    2. Wong CM,
    3. Li WW,
    4. Yeung HW
    : Insulin-like molecules in Momordica charantia seeds. J Ethnopharmacol 15:107–117, 1986
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Ng TB,
    2. Wong CM,
    3. Li WW,
    4. Yeung HW
    : Isolation and characterization of a galactose binding lectin with insulinomimetic activities: from the seeds of the bitter gourd Momordica charantia (Family Cucurbitaceae). Int J Pept Protein Res 28:163–172, 1986
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Ooi CP,
    2. Yassin Z,
    3. Hamid TA
    : Momordica charantia for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD007845, 2010
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Coronado GD,
    2. Thompson B,
    3. Tejeda S,
    4. Godina R
    : Attitudes and beliefs among Mexican Americans about type 2 diabetes. J Health Care Poor Underserved 15:576–588, 2004
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. ↵
    1. Frati AC,
    2. Gordillo BE,
    3. Altamirano P,
    4. Ariza CR,
    5. Cortes-Franco R,
    6. Chavez-Negrete A,
    7. Islas-Andrade S
    : Influence of nopal intake upon fasting glycemia in type II diabetics and healthy subjects. Arch Invest Med (Mex) 22:51–56, 1991
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Frati-Munari AC,
    2. Gordillo BE,
    3. Altamirano P,
    4. Ariza CR
    : Hypoglycemic effect of Opuntia streptacantha Lemaire in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 11:63–66, 1988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Shapiro K,
    2. Gong WC
    : Natural products used for diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 42:217–226, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Buettner C,
    2. Yeh GY,
    3. Phillips RS,
    4. Mittleman MA,
    5. Kaptchuk TJ
    : Systematic review of the effects of ginseng on cardiovascular risk factors. Ann Pharmacother 40:83–95, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Dascalu A,
    2. Sievenpiper JL,
    3. Jenkins AL,
    4. Stavro MP,
    5. Leiter LA,
    6. Arnason JT,
    7. Vuksan V
    : Five batches representative of Ontario-grown American ginseng root produce comparable reductions of postprandial glycemia in healthy individuals. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 85:856–864, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Sievenpiper JL,
    2. Arnason JT,
    3. Leiter LA,
    4. Vuksan V
    : Variable effects of American ginseng: a batch of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) with a depressed ginsenoside profile does not affect postprandial glycemia. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:243–248, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Srinivasan K
    : Plant foods in the management of diabetes mellitus: spices as beneficial antidiabetic food adjuncts. Int J Food Sci Nutr 56:399–414, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Yeh GY,
    2. Eisenberg DM,
    3. Kaptchuk TJ,
    4. Phillips RS
    : Systematic review of herbs and dietary supplements for glycemic control in diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:1277–1294, 2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Singh U,
    2. Jialal I
    : Alpha-lipoic acid supplementation and diabetes. Nutr Rev 66:646–657, 2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Jacob S,
    2. Henriksen EJ,
    3. Schiemann AL,
    4. Simon I,
    5. Clancy DE,
    6. Tritschler HJ,
    7. Jung WI,
    8. Augustin HJ,
    9. Dietze GJ
    : Enhancement of glucose disposal in patients with type 2 diabetes by alpha-lipoic acid. Arzneimittelforschung 45:872–874, 1995
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Jacob S,
    2. Henriksen EJ,
    3. Tritschler HJ,
    4. Augustin HJ,
    5. Dietze GJ
    : Improvement of insulin-stimulated glucose-disposal in type 2 diabetes after repeated parenteral administration of thioctic acid. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 104:284–288, 1996
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  43. ↵
    1. Kamenova P
    : Improvement of insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after oral administration of alpha-lipoic acid. Hormones (Athens) 5:251–258, 2006
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Evans JL,
    2. Heymann CJ,
    3. Goldfine ID,
    4. Gavin LA
    : Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and fructosamine-lowering effect of a novel, controlled-release formulation of alpha-lipoic acid. Endocr Pract 8:29–35, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Anderson RA,
    2. Bryden NA,
    3. Polansky MM
    : Dietary chromium intake: freely chosen diets, institutional diet, and individual foods. Biol Trace Elem Res 32:117–121, 1992
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  46. ↵
    1. Freund H,
    2. Atamian S,
    3. Fischer JE
    : Chromium deficiency during total parenteral nutrition. JAMA 241:496–498, 1979
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Schroeder HA
    : Chromium deficiency in rats: a syndrome simulating diabetes mellitus with retarded growth. J Nutr 88:439–445, 1966
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Balk EM,
    2. Tatsioni A,
    3. Lichtenstein AH,
    4. Lau J,
    5. Pittas AG
    : Effect of chromium supplementation on glucose metabolism and lipids: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care 30:2154–2163, 2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Cefalu WT,
    2. Rood J,
    3. Pinsonat P,
    4. Qin J,
    5. Sereda O,
    6. Levitan L,
    7. Anderson RA,
    8. Zhang XH,
    9. Martin JM,
    10. Martin CK,
    11. Wang ZQ,
    12. Newcomer B
    . Characterization of the metabolic and physiologic response to chromium supplementation in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 59:755–762, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wang ZQ,
    2. Cefalu WT
    : Current concepts about chromium supplementation in type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance. Curr Diab Rep 10:145–151, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Wang ZQ,
    2. Qin J,
    3. Martin J,
    4. Zhang XH,
    5. Sereda O,
    6. Anderson RA,
    7. Pinsonat P,
    8. Cefalu WT
    : Phenotype of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus may determine clinical response to chromium supplementation. Metabolism 56:1652–1655, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. ↵
    1. Hodgson JM,
    2. Watts GF,
    3. Playford DA,
    4. Burke V,
    5. Croft KD
    : Coenzyme Q10 improves blood pressure and glycaemic control: a controlled trial in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 56:1137–1142, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. ↵
    1. Eriksson JG,
    2. Forsen TJ,
    3. Mortensen SA,
    4. Rohde M
    : The effect of coenzyme Q10 administration on metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biofactors 9:315–318, 1999
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Tosiello L
    : Hypomagnesemia and diabetes mellitus: a review of clinical implications. Arch Intern Med 156:1143–1148, 1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. ↵
    1. Song Y,
    2. He K,
    3. Levitan EB,
    4. Manson JE,
    5. Liu S
    : Effects of oral magnesium supplementation on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled trials. Diabet Med 23:1050–1056, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Larsson SC,
    2. Wolk A
    : Magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. J Intern Med 262:208–214, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. ↵
    1. Hooper L,
    2. Thompson RL,
    3. Harrison RA,
    4. Summerbell CD,
    5. Moore H,
    6. Worthington HV,
    7. Durrington PN,
    8. Ness AR,
    9. Capps NE,
    10. Davey Smith G,
    11. Riemersma RA,
    12. Ebrahim SB
    : Omega 3 fatty acids for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003177, 2004
  57. ↵
    1. Wang C,
    2. Harris WS,
    3. Chung M,
    4. Lichtenstein AH,
    5. Balk EM,
    6. Kupelnick B,
    7. Jordan HS,
    8. Lau J
    : n-3 fatty acids from fish or fish-oil supplements, but not alpha-linolenic acid, benefit cardiovascular disease outcomes in primary- and secondary-prevention studies: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 84:5–17, 2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Hartweg J,
    2. Perera R,
    3. Montori V,
    4. Dinneen S,
    5. Neil HA,
    6. Farmer A
    : Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003205, 2008
  59. ↵
    1. Kaushik M,
    2. Mozaffarian D,
    3. Spiegelman D,
    4. Manson JE,
    5. Willett WC,
    6. Hu FB
    : Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, fish intake, and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 90:613–620, 2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    Vanadium (vanadyl sulfate) [monograph]. Altern Med Rev 14:177–180, 2009
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Cohen N,
    2. Halberstam M,
    3. Shlimovich P,
    4. Chang CJ,
    5. Shamoon H,
    6. Rossetti L
    : Oral vanadyl sulfate improves hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 95:2501–2509, 1995
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Goldfine AB,
    2. Patti ME,
    3. Zuberi L,
    4. Goldstein BJ,
    5. LeBlanc R,
    6. Landaker EJ,
    7. Jiang ZY,
    8. Willsky GR,
    9. Kahn CR
    : Metabolic effects of vanadyl sulfate in humans with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: in vivo and in vitro studies. Metabolism 49:400–410, 2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  62. ↵
    1. Halberstam M,
    2. Cohen N,
    3. Shlimovich P,
    4. Rossetti L,
    5. Shamoon H
    : Oral vanadyl sulfate improves insulin sensitivity in NIDDM but not in obese nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes 45:659–666, 1996
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Wayne PM,
    2. Kaptchuk TJ
    : Challenges inherent to t'ai chi research: part I: t'ai chi as a complex multicomponent intervention. J Altern Complement Med 14:191–197, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  64. ↵
    American Diabetes Association: Executive summary: standards of medical care in diabetes—2010. Diabetes Care 33 (Suppl. 1):S4–S10, 2010
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Clay CC,
    2. Lloyd LK,
    3. Walker JL,
    4. Sharp KR,
    5. Pankey RB
    : The metabolic cost of hatha yoga. J Strength Cond Res 19:604–610, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Hagins M,
    2. Moore W,
    3. Rundle A
    : Does practicing hatha yoga satisfy recommendations for intensity of physical activity which improves and maintains health and cardiovascular fitness? BMC Complement Altern Med 7:40, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chao YF,
    2. Chen SY,
    3. Lan C,
    4. Lai JS
    : The cardiorespiratory response and energy expenditure of Tai-Chi-Qui-Gong. Am J Chin Med 30:451–461, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Hui SS,
    2. Woo J,
    3. Kwok T
    : Evaluation of energy expenditure and cardiovascular health effects from Tai Chi and walking exercise. Hong Kong Med J 15 (Suppl. 2):4–7, 2009
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Aljasir B,
    2. Bryson M,
    3. Al-Shehri B
    : Yoga practice for the management of type II diabetes mellitus in adults: a systematic review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 7:399–408, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Innes KE,
    2. Vincent HK
    : The influence of yoga-based programs on risk profiles in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 4:469–486, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Lam P,
    2. Dennis SM,
    3. Diamond TH,
    4. Zwar N
    : Improving glycaemic and BP control in type 2 diabetes: the effectiveness of tai chi. Aust Fam Phys 37:884–887, 2008
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lee MS,
    2. Pittler MH,
    3. Kim MS,
    4. Ernst E
    : Tai chi for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabet Med 25:240–241, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    1. Tsang T,
    2. Orr R,
    3. Lam P,
    4. Comino E,
    5. Singh MF
    : Effects of tai chi on glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity in older adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomised double-blind sham-exercise-controlled trial. Age Ageing 37:64–71, 2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tsang T,
    2. Orr R,
    3. Lam P,
    4. Comino EJ,
    5. Singh MF
    : Health benefits of tai chi for older patients with type 2 diabetes: the ``Move It for Diabetes'' study: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging 2:429–439, 2007
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Fu FH
    : Effects of 14-week tai ji quan exercise on metabolic control in women with type 2 diabetes. Am J Chin Med 36:647–654, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Ospina MB,
    2. Bond K,
    3. Karkhaneh M,
    4. Tjosvold L,
    5. Vandermeer B,
    6. Liang Y,
    7. Bialy L,
    8. Hooton N,
    9. Buscemi N,
    10. Dryden DM,
    11. Klassen TP
    : Meditation practices for health: state of research. Evid Rep Technol Assess 155:1–263, 2007
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Kosuri M,
    2. Sridhar GR
    : Yoga practice in diabetes improves physical and psychological outcomes. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 7:515–517, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Song R,
    2. Ahn S,
    3. Roberts BL,
    4. Lee EO,
    5. Ahn YH
    : Adhering to a t'ai chi program to improve glucose control and quality of life for individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Altern Complement Med 15:627–632, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Yang K,
    2. Bernardo LM,
    3. Sereika SM,
    4. Conroy MB,
    5. Balk J,
    6. Burke LE
    : Utilization of 3-month yoga program for adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Electronically published ahead of print. DOI:10.1093/ecam/nep117
  74. ↵
    1. Rosenzweig S,
    2. Reibel DK,
    3. Greeson JM,
    4. Edman JS,
    5. Jasser SA,
    6. McMearty KD,
    7. Goldstein BJ
    : Mindfulness-based stress reduction is associated with improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study. Altern Ther Health Med 13:36–38, 2007
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  75. ↵
    1. Cohen MH,
    2. Eisenberg DM
    : Potential physician malpractice liability associated with complementary and integrative medical therapies. Ann Intern Med 136:596–603, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this Issue

October 2010, 28(4)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Clinical Diabetes.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Diabetes: A Clinical Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Diabetes
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Clinical Diabetes web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Diabetes: A Clinical Review
Gurjeet S. Birdee, Gloria Yeh
Clinical Diabetes Oct 2010, 28 (4) 147-155; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.28.4.147

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Complementary and Alternative Medicine Therapies for Diabetes: A Clinical Review
Gurjeet S. Birdee, Gloria Yeh
Clinical Diabetes Oct 2010, 28 (4) 147-155; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.28.4.147
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Biologically Based Practices: Herbs and Supplements
    • Advising Patients With Diabetes About CAM Therapies
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of Two Electronic Systems for Obtaining Diabetes Care Indicators in Clinical Practice
  • Focus on the Positive: A Qualitative Study of Positive Experiences Living With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes
  • Prevalence of and Characteristics Associated With Overbasalization Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Basal Insulin: A Cross-Sectional Study
Show more Feature Articles

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Abridged Standards of Care
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Care
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Clinical Diabetes Print ISSN: 0891-8929, Online ISSN: 1945-4953.