Skip to main content
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart
  • Follow ada on Twitter
  • RSS
  • Visit ada on Facebook
Clinical Diabetes

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
  • More from ADA
    • Diabetes
    • Diabetes Care
    • Diabetes Spectrum
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
    • ADA Scientific Sessions Abstracts
    • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Clinical Diabetes
  • Home
  • Current
    • Current Issue
    • Online Ahead of Print
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Browse
    • Issue Archive
    • Saved Searches
    • COVID-19 Article Collection
    • Quality Improvement Sucess Stories
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care
    • ADA Standards of Medical Care, Abridged
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • About the Editors
    • ADA Journal Policies
    • Instructions for Authors
  • Advertising
  • Reprints/Reuse
  • Subscriptions
    • Individual Subscriptions
    • Institutional Subscriptions and Site Licenses
    • Access Institutional Usage Reports
    • Purchase Single Issues
  • Alerts
    • E­mail Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
    • Diabetes Core Update
    • Special Podcast Series: Therapeutic Inertia
    • Special Podcast Series: Influenza Podcasts
    • Special Podcast Series: SGLT2 Inhibitors
    • Special Podcast Series: COVID-19
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit Cover Art
    • Instructions for Authors
    • ADA Journal Policies
Case Studies

Case Study: New-Onset Diabetes: How to Tell the Difference Between Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

  1. Joseph Largay, PAC, CDE
Clinical Diabetes 2012 Jan; 30(1): 25-26. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaclin.30.1.25
PreviousNext
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

PRESENTATION

L.C., a 25-year-old white woman, presented to the Emergency Department reporting that she was in good health until ~ 3 weeks ago, when she began experiencing polyuria and polydipsia. She had had an unintentional weight loss of ~ 10 lb in the past 2 months.

She denied visual disturbances, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, dysuria, history of the same symptoms, and recent illness. She also denied alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drug use. Her medications included only oral birth control pills, and she was a competitive volleyball player. Family history was negative for diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and autoimmune diseases.

Physical exam revealed a blood pressure of 129/82 mmHg, pulse of 88 bpm, and respiration rate of 20 breaths per minute. L.C.'s weight was 62 kg, and her BMI was 21 kg/m2. She seemed healthy and aware. Her eyes, throat, and thyroid were normal, and her neck was negative for lymphadenopathy. She had a regular heart rate and rhythm, negative for murmurs, rubs, or gallops, with normal first and second heart sounds. Lungs were clear with normal respirations. Abdominal exam revealed normal breath sounds and no tenderness, guarding, or rebound. Extremities were normal, and neurological motor and sensory functioning was intact.

Her fingerstick glucose on admission was 571 mg/dl, and subsequently measured serum glucose was 617 mg/dl. Testing revealed a sodium level of 133 mEq/l (normal 135–145), potassium of 4.0 mEq/l (normal 3.5–5.0), chloride of 99 mEq/l (normal 96–108), carbon dioxide of 25 mEq/l (normal 21–30), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) of 18 mg/dl (normal 7.0–20.0), and creatinine of 0.8 mg/dl (normal 0.4–10). Serum acetone was positive at 1:2. Urinalysis revealed a specific gravity of 1.010 (normal 1.005–1.300), glucose of 3+, ketones of 2+, and pH of 5.5 (normal 5.0–8.0), with other results normal. Arterial blood gas was not performed. A complete blood count was normal.

L.C. was treated with intravenous (IV) saline and insulin. Her glucose was corrected to 191 mg/dl. She was prescribed metformin, 500 mg twice daily, and was discharged and instructed to follow up with her primary care provider (PCP).

She returned to the Emergency Department 3 days later complaining of continued hyperglycemia with fingerstick readings > 400 mg/dl. She had not yet seen her PCP.

Physical exam revealed a blood pressure of 116/83 mmHg, pulse of 88 bpm, and respirations of 18 breaths per minute. She appeared otherwise healthy and alert, and the remainder of her physical exam was normal.

Her glucose on admission was 418 mg/dl, and laboratory test results included a sodium level of 133 mEq/l (normal 135–145), potassium of 3.2 mEq/l (normal 3.5–5.0), chloride of 98 mEq/l (normal 96–108), carbon dioxide of 26 mEq/l (normal 21–30), BUN of 12 mg/dl (normal 7.0–20.0), and creatinine of 0.7 mg/dl (normal 0.4–10). Urinalysis showed a specific gravity of 1.010 (normal 1.005–1.300), glucose of 3+, ketones of 1+, and pH of 6.0, (normal 5.0–8.0).

Again, L.C. was treated with IV saline and insulin. Her glucose was corrected to 216 mg/dl. Her metformin was increased to 1,000 mg twice daily, and she was discharged and instructed to follow up with her PCP.

She saw the PCP the next day and had glipizide added to her metformin. After 2 more days, her PCP added glargine insulin, 10 units at bedtime, and lispro insulin, 4 units before meals three times per day.

After insulin initiation, her fingerstick glucose levels were vastly improved, at 47–126 mg/dl. She was continued on metformin and referred to an endocrinologist.

At the endocrinology clinic, tests revealed an A1C of 9.5%, random glucose of 125 mg/dl, C-peptide level of 1.1 ng/ml (normal 1.1–4.4), glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 (GAD-65) antibodies of 0.28 nmol/l (normal < 0.02), total cholesterol of 156 mg/dl, HDL cholesterol of 71 mg/dl, and non-HDL cholesterol of 85 mg/dl. The endocrinologist stopped the metformin and educated L.C. about basal-bolus insulin and carbohydrate counting. After 3 months on insulin, her A1C was 5.8%, and she had regained 2 kg.

QUESTIONS

  1. What percentage of adults with newly diagnosed diabetes have type 1 diabetes?

  2. What tests should be performed to confirm autoimmune diabetes?

  3. What features are suggestive of type 1 diabetes or latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA)?

COMMENTARY

With the increase in the incidence of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents and of type 1 diabetes in adults, making a correct diagnosis has become more challenging. Type 1 diabetes results from autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic β-cells that produce insulin and can occur at any age.1 When it occurs in adults, type 1 diabetes can progress to total insulin deficiency at different rates. The slowly progressive form is known as LADA (sometimes called “type 1.5 diabetes”). There is also a more rapidly progressive form that mimics type 1 diabetes seen in children.

So how do clinicians distinguish between type 1 and type 2 diabetes? Many providers seem to make the diagnosis subjectively, perhaps only taking into account the patient's age. Researchers differ on whether clinical presentation is a reliable indicator of diabetes type.

Authors of one study2 stated that clinical features that may aid in the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes include acute onset of polyuria and polydipsia, unintentional weight loss, personal or family history of autoimmune disorders, and a BMI < 25 kg/m2. However, the authors of another study3 concluded that neither age, BMI, nor clinical presentation should be used for diagnosis.

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a common feature but may not be present early in the presentation, occurring in only 17–25% of those with new-onset diabetes.4

Patients with LADA appear to have a lower prevalence of the metabolic syndrome. While comparing patients with new-onset type 1 and type 2 diabetes, one study5 found those with LADA had a lower BMI, lower triglycerides and total cholesterol, higher HDL, and a lower prevalence of hypertension than those with type 2 diabetes. At diagnosis, fasting C-peptide levels were lower in LADA than in type 2 diabetes, perhaps confirming the typical observation of little or no response to oral agents and the need for insulin earlier in the course of the disease.

Antibody testing can assist in diagnosis. Autoimmune antibodies associated with type 1 diabetes include GAD-65, islet cell antibodies (ICAs), insulinoma-associated antigen (IA-2A), and insulin antibodies (IAAs). Of these, GAD-65 and ICAs are more common in LADA, whereas IA-2A and IAAs are more common in children with type 1 and less prevalent in adult-onset type 1 diabetes.3,6

In one study of patients recently diagnosed clinically with type 2 diabetes,3 29% were found to be positive for at least one of four antibodies. Recently, antibodies against zinc transporter 8 have been shown to be significantly associated with the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes and may be positive in otherwise antibody-negative type 1 diabetes.7

CLINICAL PEARLS

  • LADA can be present in up to 30% of patients diagnosed clinically with type 2 diabetes.

  • Many patients present like the one in this case, with typical symptoms of polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss and with no signs of metabolic syndrome and no family history of type 2 diabetes. L.C.'s continued symptomatic hyperglycemia and lack of response to metformin should have led the clinician to consider the possibility of type 1 diabetes. Inappropriate diagnosis may lead to delayed initiation of insulin treatment and prolonged symptomatic hyperglycemia.

  • Autoantibody testing can assist in obtaining a definitive diagnosis and should be performed more often.

Footnotes

  • Joseph Largay, PAC, CDE, is a clinical instructor in the Department of Medicine at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.

  • American Diabetes Association(R) Inc., 2012

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
    : Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 26 (Suppl. 1):S5–S20, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Fourlanos S,
    2. Perry C,
    3. Stein MS,
    4. Stankovich J,
    5. Harrison LC,
    6. Colman PG
    : A clinical screening tool identifies autoimmune diabetes in adults. Diabetes Care 29:950–975, 2006
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Juneja R,
    2. Hirsch IB,
    3. Naik RG,
    4. Brooks-Worrell BM,
    5. Greenbaum CJ,
    6. Palmer JP
    : Islet cell antibodies and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, but not the clinical phenotype, help to identify type 1(1/2) diabetes in patients presenting with type 2 diabetes. Metabolism 50:1008–1013, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. ↵
    1. Wolfsdorf J,
    2. Glaser N,
    3. Sperling MA
    : Diabetic ketoacidosis in infants, children, and adolescents: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 29:1150–1159, 2006
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Hosszúfalusi N,
    2. Vatay A,
    3. Rajczy K,
    4. Prohászka Z,
    5. Pozsonyi E,
    6. Horváth L,
    7. Grosz A,
    8. Gerõ L,
    9. Madácsy L,
    10. Romics L,
    11. Karádi I,
    12. Füst G,
    13. Pánczél P
    : Similar genetic features and different islet cell autoantibody pattern of latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) compared with adult-onset type 1 diabetes with rapid progression. Diabetes Care 26:452–457, 2003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Palmer JP,
    2. Hirsch IB
    : What's in a name; latent autoimmune diabetes of adults, type 1.5, adult-onset, and type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:536–537, 2003
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Vermeulen I,
    2. Weets I,
    3. Asanghanwa M,
    4. Ruige J,
    5. Van Gaal L,
    6. Mathieu C,
    7. Keymeulen B,
    8. Lampasona V,
    9. Wenzlau JM,
    10. Hutton JC,
    11. Pipeleers DG,
    12. Gorus FK,
    13. Belgian Diabetes Registry
    : Contribution of antibodies against IA-2β and zinc transporter 8 to classification of diabetes diagnosed under 40 years of age. Diabetes Care 34:1760–1765, 2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Clinical Diabetes: 30 (1)

In this Issue

January 2012, 30(1)
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by Author
Sign up to receive current issue alerts
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about Clinical Diabetes.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Case Study: New-Onset Diabetes: How to Tell the Difference Between Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Clinical Diabetes
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Clinical Diabetes web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Case Study: New-Onset Diabetes: How to Tell the Difference Between Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Joseph Largay
Clinical Diabetes Jan 2012, 30 (1) 25-26; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.30.1.25

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Add to Selected Citations
Share

Case Study: New-Onset Diabetes: How to Tell the Difference Between Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Joseph Largay
Clinical Diabetes Jan 2012, 30 (1) 25-26; DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.30.1.25
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • PRESENTATION
    • QUESTIONS
    • COMMENTARY
    • CLINICAL PEARLS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Isolation and Education During a Pandemic: Novel Telehealth Approach to Family Education for a Child With New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes and Concomitant COVID-19
  • Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis in a Patient Prescribed Empagliflozin and a Ketogenic Diet: A Case of Misdiagnosed Type 1 Diabetes
  • Syndromic Conundrums in Diabetes: Seek and Ye Shall Find: The Dorfman-Chanarin Syndrome
Show more Case Studies

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Abridged Standards of Care
  • Archives
  • Submit
  • Subscribe
  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

More Information

  • About the Journal
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Journal Policies
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Advertising
  • Privacy Policy: ADA Journals
  • Copyright Notice/Public Access Policy
  • Contact Us

Other ADA Resources

  • Diabetes
  • Diabetes Care
  • Diabetes Spectrum
  • Scientific Sessions Abstracts
  • Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes
  • BMJ Open - Diabetes Research & Care
  • Professional Books
  • Diabetes Forecast

 

  • DiabetesJournals.org
  • Diabetes Core Update
  • ADA's DiabetesPro
  • ADA Member Directory
  • Diabetes.org

© 2021 by the American Diabetes Association. Clinical Diabetes Print ISSN: 0891-8929, Online ISSN: 1945-4953.